Stamper J H, Nigg H N, Mahon W D, Nielsen A P, Royer M D
Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 1989 Jul-Aug;18(4):515-29. doi: 10.1007/BF01055018.
The exposure of pesticide applicators in a commercial greenhouse facility was assessed. Data were collected from four handgunners who applied fluvalinate (insecticide), chlorpyrifos (insecticide), ethazol (fungicide), and dicofol (miticide). Potential exposure was measured with exposure pads placed outside all clothing of the applicator. Handwashes and air samples were also collected, as were pre- and post-exposure tank mixture samples. Pesticide penetration was measured with exposure pads placed inside protective clothing. When all exposure assessments were normalized for spray rate, it was determined that applicators were at significantly greater potential dermal risk (excluding hands) from fluvalinate. The normalized air samples showed significantly more exposure to the applicator from ethazol. Exposure to outside pads was primarily (84%) to the legs of the applicators. Ethazol penetrated Tyvek coveralls more readily than the other compounds. Tank mixture analyses suggested that the wettable powder formulations were not well-mixed.
对商业温室设施中农药施用者的暴露情况进行了评估。收集了四名手持喷枪施用氟氯苯菊酯（杀虫剂）、毒死蜱（杀虫剂）、乙唑醇（杀菌剂）和三氯杀螨醇（杀螨剂）的施用者的数据。通过将暴露垫放置在施用者所有衣物外部来测量潜在暴露。还收集了洗手样本和空气样本，以及暴露前后的罐混物样本。通过将暴露垫放置在防护服内部来测量农药渗透率。当所有暴露评估针对喷雾速率进行归一化处理后，确定施用者因氟氯苯菊酯而面临的潜在皮肤风险（不包括手部）显著更高。归一化后的空气样本显示施用者接触乙唑醇的情况明显更多。外部垫的暴露主要（84%）集中在施用者的腿部。乙唑醇比其他化合物更易穿透特卫强防护服。罐混物分析表明可湿性粉剂配方混合不均匀。
