Pemberton Michael R., Bose Jonaki, Kilmer Greta, Kroutil Larry A., Forman-Hoffman Valerie L., Gfroerer Joseph C.
RTI International (a trade name of Research Triangle Institute), Research Triangle Park, NC
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD
In addition to collecting data on substance use and mental health in the United States, the National Survey on Drug Use and Health also collects data on health conditions and health care utilization. It is important for users of these data to recognize how the NSDUH estimates differ from prevalence estimates produced by other nationally representative data sources, which have various objectives and scope, sampling designs, and data collection procedures. This report compares specific health conditions, overall health, and health care utilization prevalence estimates from the 2006 NSDUH and other national data sources. Methodological differences among these data sources that may contribute to differences in estimates are described. In addition to NSDUH, three of the data sources use respondent self-reports to measure health characteristics and service utilization: the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), and the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS). One survey, the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), conducts initial interviews in respondents’ homes, collecting further data at nearby locations. Five data sources provide health care utilization data extracted from hospital records; these sources include the National Hospital Discharge Survey (NHDS), the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS), the National Health and Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS), and the Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN). Several methodological differences that could cause differences in estimates are discussed, including type and mode of data collection; weighting and representativeness of the sample; question placement, wording, and format; and use of proxy reporting for adolescents. There were no differences between the lifetime estimate of diabetes among adults from NSDUH (7.7 percent) and the estimates from NHIS, NHANES, BRFSS, and MEPS. The lifetime estimate of asthma among adults from NSDUH (10.7 percent) was similar to the estimate from NHIS (11.0 percent); estimates from other sources ranged from 9.6 percent to 14.2 percent. The lifetime estimates of stroke and high blood pressure among adults from NSDUH were both lower than estimates from NHIS, NHANES, and MEPS, and there was considerable variation between surveys in the rate of lifetime heart disease. Estimates of past year inpatient hospitalization among adults did not differ significantly between NSDUH and NHANES, but NSDUH was significantly higher than the estimates derived from NHIS and MEPS. For both adults and adolescents, the NSDUH estimates of receiving treatment in an ER in the past year were higher than estimates from other surveys. Demographic differences in the prevalence of chronic health conditions and health care utilization were similar across multiple surveys. Given all of the methodological differences among these data sources, the similarities among estimates are noteworthy.
除了收集美国药物使用和心理健康数据外,全国药物使用和健康调查还收集健康状况和医疗保健利用情况的数据。这些数据的使用者必须认识到全国药物使用和健康调查(NSDUH)的估计值与其他具有全国代表性的数据源所产生的患病率估计值有何不同,这些数据源具有不同的目标和范围、抽样设计以及数据收集程序。本报告比较了2006年全国药物使用和健康调查(NSDUH)以及其他国家数据源中特定健康状况、总体健康状况和医疗保健利用患病率的估计值。描述了这些数据源之间可能导致估计值差异的方法学差异。除全国药物使用和健康调查(NSDUH)外,其中三个数据源使用受访者自我报告来衡量健康特征和服务利用情况:国家健康访谈调查(NHIS)、行为危险因素监测系统(BRFSS)和医疗支出小组调查(MEPS)。一项调查,即国家健康和营养检查调查(NHANES),在受访者家中进行初步访谈,并在附近地点收集进一步的数据。五个数据源提供从医院记录中提取的医疗保健利用数据;这些数据源包括国家医院出院调查(NHDS)、全国住院患者样本(NIS)、全国急诊科样本(NEDS)、国家健康和门诊医疗调查(NHAMCS)以及药物滥用预警网络(DAWN)。讨论了可能导致估计值差异的几个方法学差异,包括数据收集的类型和方式;样本的加权和代表性;问题的位置、措辞和格式;以及青少年使用代理报告的情况。全国药物使用和健康调查(NSDUH)中成年人糖尿病的终生估计值(7.7%)与国家健康访谈调查(NHIS)、国家健康和营养检查调查(NHANES)、行为危险因素监测系统(BRFSS)和医疗支出小组调查(MEPS)的估计值之间没有差异。全国药物使用和健康调查(NSDUH)中成年人哮喘的终生估计值(10.7%)与国家健康访谈调查(NHIS)的估计值(11.0%)相似;其他来源的估计值在9.6%至14.2%之间。全国药物使用和健康调查(NSDUH)中成年人中风和高血压的终生估计值均低于国家健康访谈调查(NHIS)、国家健康和营养检查调查(NHANES)和医疗支出小组调查(MEPS)的估计值,并且不同调查之间终生心脏病发病率存在相当大的差异。全国药物使用和健康调查(NSDUH)和国家健康和营养检查调查(NHANES)中成年人过去一年住院治疗的估计值没有显著差异,但全国药物使用和健康调查(NSDUH)明显高于国家健康访谈调查(NHIS)和医疗支出小组调查(MEPS)得出的估计值。对于成年人和青少年来说,全国药物使用和健康调查(NSDUH)中过去一年在急诊室接受治疗的估计值高于其他调查的估计值。多种调查中慢性健康状况患病率和医疗保健利用情况的人口统计学差异相似。考虑到这些数据源之间所有的方法学差异,估计值之间的相似性值得注意。