Suppr超能文献

非慢性、非根性下腰痛患者除药物治疗外的补充疗法:一项系统综述

Complementary therapies in addition to medication for patients with nonchronic, nonradicular low back pain: a systematic review.

作者信息

Rothberg Samantha, Friedman Benjamin W

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Jan;35(1):55-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.10.001. Epub 2016 Oct 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A total of 2.7 million patients present to US emergency departments annually for management of low back pain (LBP). Despite optimal medical therapy, more than 50% remain functionally impaired 3 months later. We performed a systematic review to address the following question: Among patients with nonchronic LBP, does spinal manipulation, massage, exercise, or yoga, when combined with standard medical therapy, improve pain and functional outcomes more than standard medical therapy alone?

METHODS

We used published searches to identify relevant studies, supplemented with our own updated search. Studies were culled from the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Index to Chiropractic Literature. Our goal was to identify randomized studies that included patients with nonradicular LBP of <12 weeks' duration that compared the complementary therapy to usual care, sham therapy, or interventions known not to be efficacious, while providing all patients with standard analgesics. The outcomes of interest were improvement in pain scores or measures of functionality.

RESULTS

We identified 2 randomized controlled trials in which chiropractic manipulation + medical therapy failed to show benefit vs medical therapy alone. We identified 4 randomized controlled trials in which exercise therapy + medical therapy failed to show benefit vs medical therapy alone. We did not identify any eligible studies of yoga or massage therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, for patients with nonchronic, nonradicular LBP, available evidence does not support the use of spinal manipulation or exercise therapy in addition to standard medical therapy. There is insufficient evidence to determine if yoga or massage is beneficial.

摘要

背景

每年共有270万患者因腰痛(LBP)前往美国急诊科就诊。尽管接受了最佳的药物治疗,但3个月后仍有超过50%的患者存在功能障碍。我们进行了一项系统评价,以解决以下问题:在非慢性腰痛患者中,与标准药物治疗相比,脊柱推拿、按摩、运动或瑜伽与标准药物治疗联合使用时,是否能更有效地改善疼痛和功能结局?

方法

我们利用已发表的检索结果,并补充了我们自己更新的检索。研究从Cochrane对照试验注册库、Medline、EMBASE、CINAHL和脊椎按摩文献索引中筛选。我们的目标是确定随机研究,这些研究纳入了病程<12周的非根性腰痛患者,将补充疗法与常规护理、假治疗或已知无效的干预措施进行比较,同时为所有患者提供标准镇痛药。感兴趣的结局是疼痛评分或功能指标的改善。

结果

我们确定了2项随机对照试验,其中脊椎按摩推拿+药物治疗与单纯药物治疗相比未显示出益处。我们确定了4项随机对照试验,其中运动疗法+药物治疗与单纯药物治疗相比未显示出益处。我们未找到任何关于瑜伽或按摩疗法的符合条件的研究。

结论

总之,对于非慢性、非根性腰痛患者,现有证据不支持在标准药物治疗之外使用脊柱推拿或运动疗法。尚无足够证据确定瑜伽或按摩是否有益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验