Thiart M, Ikram A, Lamberts R P
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg Campus, P.O. Box 19063, Tygerberg, Cape Town 7505, South Africa.
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg Campus, P.O. Box 19063, Tygerberg, Cape Town 7505, South Africa.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016 Dec;102(8):1001-1004. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.09.005. Epub 2016 Oct 15.
Although fragment specific fixation has proved to be an effective treatment regime, it has not been established how successfully this treatment could be performed using fluoroscopy and what the added value of arthroscopy could be. Establish gap and step-off distances after in intra-articular distal radius fractures that have been treated with fragment specific fixation while using fluoroscopy.
Forty-four patients with an intra-articular distal radius fracture were treated with fragment specific fixation while using fluoroscopy.
After the treatment of the intra-articular distal radius fracture with fragment specific fixation and the use of fluoroscopy, but before the completion of the surgical intervention, all gap, and step-off distances were determined by using arthroscopy. In addition, the joint was checked for any other wrist pathologies.
Arthroscopy after the surgical intervention showed that in 37 patients no gap distances could be detected, while in six patients a gap distance of≤2mm was found and in one patient, a gap distance of 3mm. Similarly, arthroscopy revealed no step-off distances in 33 patients, while in 11 patients a step-off distance of≤2mm was found. Although additional wrist pathologies were found in 48% of our population, only one patient needed surgical intervention. Three months after the surgical intervention wrist flexion was 41±10°, wrist extension 51±17°, ulnar deviation 19±10°, radial deviation 32±12° while patients could pronate and supinate their wrist to 85±5° and 74±20°, respectively.
Intra-articular distal radius fractures can be treated successfully with fragment specific fixation and the use of fluoroscopy. As almost all gap and step-off distances could be reduced to an acceptable level, the scope for arthroscopy to further improve this treatment regime is limited. The functional outcome scores that were found 3 months after the surgical intervention were similar to what has been reported in other studies using different treatment option. These findings suggest that fragment specific fixation is a good alternative for treating intra-articular distal radius fractures. As in most cases, only fluoroscopy is needed for fragment specific fixation, this treatment technique is a good treatment option for resource-limited hospitals, setting who do not have access to arthroscopy.
III, case-control study.
尽管骨折块特异性固定已被证明是一种有效的治疗方法,但对于使用透视进行该治疗的成功率以及关节镜检查的附加价值尚未明确。在使用透视对关节内桡骨远端骨折进行骨折块特异性固定后,确定间隙和台阶距离。
44例关节内桡骨远端骨折患者在使用透视的情况下接受了骨折块特异性固定治疗。
在使用透视对关节内桡骨远端骨折进行骨折块特异性固定治疗后,但在手术干预完成前,通过关节镜检查确定所有间隙和台阶距离。此外,检查关节是否存在其他腕部病变。
手术干预后的关节镜检查显示,37例患者未检测到间隙距离,6例患者间隙距离≤2mm,1例患者间隙距离为3mm。同样,关节镜检查显示33例患者无台阶距离,11例患者台阶距离≤2mm。尽管在48%的患者中发现了其他腕部病变,但只有1例患者需要手术干预。手术干预3个月后,腕关节屈曲为41±10°,伸展为51±17°,尺偏为19±10°,桡偏为32±12°,患者腕关节旋前和旋后分别可达85±5°和74±20°。
关节内桡骨远端骨折可通过骨折块特异性固定和透视成功治疗。由于几乎所有间隙和台阶距离都可降至可接受水平,关节镜检查进一步改善该治疗方法的空间有限。手术干预3个月后的功能结果评分与其他使用不同治疗方法的研究报告相似。这些发现表明,骨折块特异性固定是治疗关节内桡骨远端骨折的良好选择。由于在大多数情况下,骨折块特异性固定仅需透视,该治疗技术对于无法使用关节镜检查的资源有限的医院环境而言是一种良好的治疗选择。
III,病例对照研究。