Quan L X, An H X, Wang D X
Department of Anesthesiology, Zhengzhou Orthopedic Hospital, Zhengzhou 450052,China.
Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China.
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2016 Oct 18;48(5):855-859.
To observe the effects of 0.4 μg/(kg×h) dose of dexmedetomidine on intra-operative wake-up test in children patients undergoing scoliosis surgery.
Sixty patients for posterior scoliosis correction (ASA I-II, aged 5-16 years) from March 2013 to April 2015 were enrolled in this prospective, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study, The patients were randomly classified into two groups to receive dexmedetomidine (group RD, n=30) or saline solution (group R, n=30). In group RD, dexmedetomidine [0.4 μg/(kg×h)] was administered after tracheal intubation, while the equal volume saline solution was given instead in group R. Anesthesia was induced with midazolam, propofol, sufentanyl and cisatracurium, and anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane inhalation and a continuous intravenous infusion of remifentanil in the both groups.BIS (bispectral index, BIS) value was maintained at 40-60,and mean arterial pressure (MAP) was maintained at ≥ 60 mmHg before the wake-up test.When the wake-up test was performed, immediately the dexmedetomidine and remifentanil infusion were stopped, and the end-tidal concentration of sevoflurane was adjusted to 0. Mean arterial pressure, and heart rate (HR) were recorded before anesthesia and at 5-minute intervals during the wake-up test. The wake-up test time, arousal quality and sedation scores were recorded also.In addition, the data were also gathered on the dosage of ephedrine and atropine were used, as well as the intraoperative awareness in the patients who were followed up on the first day after the operation.
There were no differences between group RD and group R with regard to HR and MAP at getting into the operation room (t=-1.460, P=0.150;t =-1.015, P=0.315). In group RD, no evidence was found for a difference in HR and MAP at awakening up versus at getting into the operation room (t=0.974, P=0.340; t=-1.449, P=0.161), while in group R, an increase in HR and MAP occurred at awakening versus at getting into the operation room (t=-2.106, P=0.044; t=-2.352, P=0.026). There were no significant differences in sedation scores and wake-up test time between the two groups (t=1.986, P=0.052; t=0.392, P=0.697). The wake-up test quality was significantly better in group RD than in group R (t=-2.098,P=0.041). HR in group RD was significantly lower than that in group R at any time point during the wake-up test (P<0.05). Four patients had awareness occurrence during the operation in group R, and no awareness occurrence in group RD.
Dexmedetomidine, when administered at a rate of 0.4 μg/(kg×h) as an adjuvant of sevoflurane inhalational anesthesia, could improve the wake-up test quality, and maintain hemodynamic stability during scoliosis surgery.
观察0.4μg/(kg×h)剂量的右美托咪定对脊柱侧弯手术患儿术中唤醒试验的影响。
选取2013年3月至2015年4月行后路脊柱侧弯矫正术的60例患者(ASA I-II级,年龄5-16岁),纳入这项前瞻性、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照研究。将患者随机分为两组,分别接受右美托咪定(RD组,n=30)或生理盐水(R组,n=30)。RD组在气管插管后给予右美托咪定[0.4μg/(kg×h)],而R组给予等量生理盐水。两组均采用咪达唑仑、丙泊酚、舒芬太尼和顺阿曲库铵诱导麻醉,并用七氟烷吸入和瑞芬太尼持续静脉输注维持麻醉。唤醒试验前,双谱指数(BIS)值维持在40-60,平均动脉压(MAP)维持在≥60mmHg。进行唤醒试验时,立即停止输注右美托咪定和瑞芬太尼,并将七氟烷的呼气末浓度调至0。记录麻醉前及唤醒试验期间每隔5分钟的平均动脉压和心率(HR)。同时记录唤醒试验时间、唤醒质量和镇静评分。此外,还收集了麻黄碱和阿托品的使用剂量以及术后第一天随访患者的术中知晓情况的数据。
进入手术室时,RD组和R组的HR和MAP无差异(t=-1.460,P=0.150;t=-1.015,P=0.315)。在RD组,苏醒时与进入手术室时相比,HR和MAP无差异(t=0.974,P=0.340;t=-1.449,P=0.161),而在R组,苏醒时HR和MAP较进入手术室时升高(t=-2.106,P=0.044;t=-2.352,P=0.026)。两组镇静评分和唤醒试验时间无显著差异(t=1.986,P=0.052;t=0.392,P=0.697)。RD组的唤醒试验质量明显优于R组(t=-2.098,P=0.041)。唤醒试验期间任何时间点,RD组的HR均显著低于R组(P<0.05)。R组有4例患者术中发生知晓,RD组无术中知晓发生。
右美托咪定以0.4μg/(kg×h)的速率作为七氟烷吸入麻醉的辅助用药时,可提高唤醒试验质量,并在脊柱侧弯手术中维持血流动力学稳定。