Schoen F J, Mohammed H, Fischlschweiger W, Going R E
J Dent Res. 1978 Feb;57(2):283-90. doi: 10.1177/00220345780570022401.
Twenty-two materials, including 19 dental impression elastomers, were compared in their ability to replicate microscopic detail. Some polysulfide, silicone, and polyether materials performed well. Curiously, microscopic replication ability generally correlated inversely with that expected from the nominal consistency. The test method developed appears to be a suitable microreplication evaluation standard.
对22种材料（包括19种牙科印模弹性体）复制微观细节的能力进行了比较。一些聚硫橡胶、硅橡胶和聚醚材料表现良好。奇怪的是，微观复制能力通常与标称稠度预期的情况呈反比。所开发的测试方法似乎是一种合适的微观复制评估标准。
