Bartholomay Patricia, Pelissari Daniele Maria, de Araujo Wildo Navegantes, Yadon Zaida E, Heldal Einar
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2016 Jan;39(1):3-11.
Objective To assess 1) the burden and socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of tuberculosis (TB) cases, and 2) the quality of TB care provided to patients who entered and remained within each health care service level (primary, secondary, or tertiary) and those who moved from one level to another, using process and results indicators. Methods This cross-sectional operational research study assessed new smear-positive pulmonary TB cases diagnosed in Brazilian state capitals in 2013 using TB program records and the TB surveillance system. Quality of care was assessed based on process and results indicators including HIV screening, TB contact screening, Directly Observed Treatment (DOT), sputum smear microscopy monitoring, and treatment outcomes. Results There were 12 977 new smear-positive TB cases reported. Of these, 7 964 (61.4%) cases were diagnosed and treated at the primary care level, 1 195 (9.2%) at the secondary level, 1 521 (11.7%) at the tertiary level, and 2 296 (17.7%) at more than one level, with 65% of the latter group moved from the tertiary level to the primary level. The proportion of cases tested for HIV was significantly higher in patients receiving care at the primary level compared to those receiving care at the secondary level (prevalence ratio (PR): 1.17; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.07-1.28) and those attending more than one service level. Patients attending the tertiary health care level had a 122% higher PR for not doing DOT ("DOT not done") compared to patients at the primary level (PR: 2.22; CI: 2.12-2.32). When the two levels were compared, the prevalence for an unfavorable outcome (lost to follow-up, death from TB, death with TB, transferred out, or not evaluated) was higher at the tertiary health care level. Conclusions Primary health services are successfully incorporating the management of new smear-positive TB cases. Primary health care obtained better operational indicators than secondary or tertiary levels.
目的 1)评估结核病(TB)病例的负担以及社会人口统计学和临床特征,2)使用过程指标和结果指标,评估在每个医疗服务级别(初级、中级或高级)就诊并留在该级别以及从一个级别转诊至另一个级别的患者所接受的结核病治疗质量。方法 这项横断面运营研究使用结核病项目记录和结核病监测系统,评估了2013年在巴西各州首府诊断出的新涂阳肺结核病例。基于包括HIV筛查、结核病接触者筛查、直接观察治疗(DOT)、痰涂片显微镜检查监测和治疗结果等过程指标和结果指标,对治疗质量进行了评估。结果 共报告了12977例新涂阳肺结核病例。其中,7964例(61.4%)在初级保健级别诊断并接受治疗,1195例(9.2%)在中级保健级别,1521例(11.7%)在高级保健级别,2296例(17.7%)在多个级别接受治疗,后一组中有65%是从高级保健级别转诊至初级保健级别。与在中级保健级别接受治疗的患者相比,在初级保健级别接受治疗的患者中进行HIV检测的病例比例显著更高(患病率比(PR):1.17;95%置信区间(CI):1.07 - 1.28),与在多个服务级别接受治疗的患者相比也是如此。与初级保健级别患者相比,在高级医疗保健级别接受治疗的患者“未进行DOT”的PR高出122%(PR:2.22;CI:2.12 - 2.32)。当比较这两个级别时,高级医疗保健级别不良结局(失访、死于结核病、患结核病死亡、转出或未评估)的患病率更高。结论 初级卫生服务机构成功纳入了新涂阳肺结核病例的管理。初级卫生保健获得的运营指标优于中级或高级保健级别。