Epsztein Kanczuk Marcelo, Barrett Nicholas Martin, Arzola Cristian, Downey Kristi, Ye Xiang Y, Carvalho Jose C A
From the *Department of Anesthesia, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Ontario; and †Department of Pediatrics, Micare Research Centre, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Anesth Analg. 2017 Feb;124(2):537-541. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001655.
Most studies that have compared programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) with continuous epidural infusion regimens have included patient-controlled epidural analgesia and/or manual bolus as rescue analgesia for breakthrough pain. Consequently, the optimal time interval between PIEB is yet to be determined. We designed a study to establish the optimal time interval between PIEB of 10 mL of bupivacaine 0.0625% with fentanyl 2 μg/mL to produce effective analgesia in 90% of women during first stage of labor without breakthrough pain.
We conducted a double-blind sequential allocation trial with a biased-coin up-down design to obtain the effective interval 90% for the PIEB regimen. We included American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 2-3 nulliparous women at term undergoing spontaneous or induced labor requesting epidural analgesia. An ultrasound-assisted epidural catheter placement was performed at L2/3 or L3/4. A test dose of 3 mL of bupivacaine 0.125% plus fentanyl 3.3 μg/mL was followed by a loading dose of 12 mL of the same solution. PIEB was then started in women whose pain scores achieved Verbal Numerical Rating Score ≤1/10 within 20 minutes after the end of the loading dose. In all subjects, the programmed bolus dose was fixed at 10 mL of bupivacaine 0.0625% with fentanyl 2 μg/mL. The first bolus was delivered 1 hour after the loading dose. The PIEB interval was set at 60 minutes for the first patient and at varying time intervals (60, 50, 40, and 30 minutes; groups 60, 50, 40 and 30, respectively) for the subsequent patients, according to a biased-coin design. The primary outcome was effective analgesia, defined as no requirement for a patient-controlled epidural analgesia or a manual bolus for 6 hours after the initiation of the epidural analgesia or until the patient presented with full cervical dilatation, whichever event occurred first. Pain scores, sensory block levels to ice, degree of motor block, and blood pressure were assessed hourly.
We studied 40 women. The estimated effective interval 90% was 42.6 minutes (95% confidence interval 38.9-46.4) using the truncated Dixon and Mood method and 36.8 minutes (95% confidence interval 31.0-49.0) using the Isotonic Regression analysis. Almost 70% of the patients in group 30 presented with sensory block above T6, compared with 44%, 22%, and 11% in groups 40, 50, and 60, respectively. Only patients in group 30 presented with motor blockade. The incidence of hypotension was low in all groups with no treatment required.
The optimal time interval between PIEB of 10 mL of bupivacaine 0.0625% with fentanyl 2 μg/mL is approximately 40 minutes. Further studies to determine the efficacy of this regimen throughout the entire duration of labor are warranted.
大多数比较程序化间歇性硬膜外推注(PIEB)与持续硬膜外输注方案的研究都将患者自控硬膜外镇痛和/或手动推注作为突破性疼痛的补救镇痛措施。因此,PIEB之间的最佳时间间隔尚未确定。我们设计了一项研究,以确定在分娩第一阶段90%的女性中,使用0.0625%布比卡因10 mL与2 μg/mL芬太尼进行PIEB产生有效镇痛且无突破性疼痛的最佳时间间隔。
我们采用偏倚硬币上下设计进行了一项双盲序贯分配试验,以获得PIEB方案90%的有效间隔。我们纳入了美国麻醉医师协会身体状况为2 - 3级、足月、正在经历自然分娩或引产且要求硬膜外镇痛的未产妇。在L2/3或L3/4进行超声引导下硬膜外导管置入。先给予3 mL 0.125%布比卡因加3.3 μg/mL芬太尼的试验剂量,随后给予12 mL相同溶液的负荷剂量。在负荷剂量结束后20分钟内疼痛评分达到言语数字评定量表≤1/10的女性开始PIEB。在所有受试者中,程序化推注剂量固定为0.0625%布比卡因10 mL与2 μg/mL芬太尼。首次推注在负荷剂量后1小时进行。根据偏倚硬币设计,第一位患者的PIEB间隔设定为60分钟,后续患者的PIEB间隔设定为不同的时间间隔(60、50、40和30分钟;分别为60、50、40和30组)。主要结局是有效镇痛,定义为在硬膜外镇痛开始后6小时内或直至患者宫颈完全扩张(以先发生者为准)无需患者自控硬膜外镇痛或手动推注。每小时评估疼痛评分、对冰敷的感觉阻滞平面、运动阻滞程度和血压。
我们研究了40名女性。使用截断的狄克逊和穆德方法估计的90%有效间隔为42.6分钟(95%置信区间38.9 - 46.4),使用等渗回归分析为36.8分钟(95%置信区间31.0 - 49.0)。30组中近70%的患者感觉阻滞平面高于T6,而40、50和60组分别为44%、22%和11%。只有30组的患者出现运动阻滞。所有组低血压的发生率都很低,无需治疗。
0.0625%布比卡因10 mL与2 μg/mL芬太尼进行PIEB的最佳时间间隔约为40分钟。有必要进行进一步研究以确定该方案在整个产程中的疗效。