Tulloch Ayesha I T, Pichancourt Jean-Baptiste, Gosper Carl R, Sanders Angela, Chadès Iadine
School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, 4102, Australia.
Fenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, 2602, Australia.
Ecol Appl. 2016 Oct;26(7):2175-2189. doi: 10.1002/eap.1362. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
Changed fire regimes have led to declines of fire-regime-adapted species and loss of biodiversity globally. Fire affects population processes of growth, reproduction, and dispersal in different ways, but there is little guidance about the best fire regime(s) to maintain species population processes in fire-prone ecosystems. We use a process-based approach to determine the best range of fire intervals for keystone plant species in a highly modified Mediterranean ecosystem in southwestern Australia where current fire regimes vary. In highly fragmented areas, fires are few due to limited ignitions and active suppression of wildfire on private land, while in highly connected protected areas fires are frequent and extensive. Using matrix population models, we predict population growth of seven Banksia species under different environmental conditions and patch connectivity, and evaluate the sensitivity of species survival to different fire management strategies and burning intervals. We discover that contrasting, complementary patterns of species life-histories with time since fire result in no single best fire regime. All strategies result in the local patch extinction of at least one species. A small number of burning strategies secure complementary species sets depending on connectivity and post-fire growing conditions. A strategy of no fire always leads to fewer species persisting than prescribed fire or random wildfire, while too-frequent or too-rare burning regimes lead to the possible local extinction of all species. In low landscape connectivity, we find a smaller range of suitable fire intervals, and strategies of prescribed or random burning result in a lower number of species with positive growth rates after 100 years on average compared with burning high connectivity patches. Prescribed fire may reduce or increase extinction risk when applied in combination with wildfire depending on patch connectivity. Poor growing conditions result in a significantly reduced number of species exhibiting positive growth rates after 100 years of management. By exploring the consequences of managing fire, we are able to identify which species are likely to disappear under a given fire regime. Identifying the appropriate complementarity of fire intervals, and their species-specific as well as community-level consequences, is crucial to reduce local extinctions of species in fragmented fire-prone landscapes.
火灾状况的改变已导致全球范围内适应火灾状况的物种数量减少和生物多样性丧失。火灾以不同方式影响种群的生长、繁殖和扩散过程,但对于在易发生火灾的生态系统中维持物种种群过程的最佳火灾状况,几乎没有相关指导。我们采用基于过程的方法,来确定澳大利亚西南部一个高度改造的地中海生态系统中关键植物物种的最佳火灾间隔范围,该地区当前的火灾状况各不相同。在高度破碎化的地区,由于点火有限以及对私人土地上野火的积极抑制,火灾较少,而在连接性高的保护区,火灾频繁且范围广泛。我们使用矩阵种群模型,预测七种山龙眼科植物在不同环境条件和斑块连通性下的种群增长,并评估物种生存对不同火灾管理策略和燃烧间隔的敏感性。我们发现,物种生命史与火灾发生后的时间形成的对比性、互补性模式,导致不存在单一的最佳火灾状况。所有策略都会导致至少一个物种在局部斑块灭绝。根据连通性和火灾后生长条件,少数燃烧策略能确保互补的物种组合。不进行火灾的策略总是比规定火烧或随机野火导致更少的物种存活,而过于频繁或过于稀少的燃烧状况则可能导致所有物种在局部灭绝。在景观连通性较低的情况下,我们发现合适的火灾间隔范围较小,与燃烧高连通性斑块相比,规定火烧或随机火烧策略在100年后平均导致正增长率物种数量减少。规定火烧与野火结合使用时,根据斑块连通性,可能会降低或增加灭绝风险。生长条件较差会导致在管理100年后呈现正增长率的物种数量显著减少。通过探索火灾管理的后果,我们能够确定在给定的火灾状况下哪些物种可能消失。确定火灾间隔的适当互补性及其物种特异性以及群落水平的后果,对于减少易发生火灾的破碎景观中物种的局部灭绝至关重要。