Currie William S, Kiger Sarah, Nassauer Joan I, Hutchins Meghan, Marshall Lauren L, Brown Daniel G, Riolo Rick L, Robinson Derek T, Hart Stephanie K
School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, USA.
Center for the Study of Complex Systems, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, USA.
Ecol Appl. 2016 Jul;26(5):1421-1436. doi: 10.1890/15-0817.
Exurban residential land (one housing unit per 0.2-16.2 ha) is growing in importance as a human-dominated land use. Carbon storage in the soils and vegetation of exurban land is poorly known, as are the effects on C storage of choices made by developers and residents. We studied C storage in exurban yards in southeastern Michigan, USA, across a range of parcel sizes and different types of neighborhoods. We divided each residential parcel into ecological zones (EZ) characterized by vegetation, soil, and human behavior such as mowing, irrigation, and raking. We found a heterogeneous mixture of trees and shrubs, turfgrasses, mulched gardens, old-field vegetation, and impervious surfaces. The most extensive zone type was turfgrass with sparse woody vegetation (mean 26% of parcel area), followed by dense woody vegetation (mean 21% of parcel area). Areas of turfgrass with sparse woody vegetation had trees in larger size classes (> 50 cm dbh) than did areas of dense woody vegetation. Using aerial photointerpretation, we scaled up C storage to neighborhoods. Varying C storage by neighborhood type resulted from differences in impervious area (8-26% of parcel area) and area of dense woody vegetation (11-28%). Averaged and multiplied across areas in differing neighborhood types, exurban residential land contained 5240 ± 865 g C/m in vegetation, highly sensitive to large trees, and 13 800 ± 1290 g C/m in soils (based on a combined sampling and modeling approach). These contents are greater than for agricultural land in the region, but lower than for mature forest stands. Compared with mature forests, exurban land contained more shrubs and less downed woody debris and it had similar tree size-class distributions up to 40 cm dbh but far fewer trees in larger size classes. If the trees continue to grow, exurban residential land could sequester additional C for decades. Patterns and processes of C storage in exurban residential land were driven by land management practices that affect soil and vegetation, reflecting the choices of designers, developers, and residents. This study provides an example of human-mediated C storage in a coupled human-natural system.
作为一种以人类为主导的土地利用方式,远郊居住用地(每0.2 - 16.2公顷有一个住房单元)的重要性日益凸显。远郊土地土壤和植被中的碳储量鲜为人知,开发商和居民的选择对碳储量的影响也同样如此。我们研究了美国密歇根州东南部不同地块大小和不同类型社区的远郊庭院中的碳储量。我们将每个居住地块划分为以植被、土壤以及诸如割草、灌溉和耙地等人类活动为特征的生态区(EZ)。我们发现了树木和灌木、草坪草、覆盖花园、弃耕地植被以及不透水表面的异质混合。最广泛的区域类型是木本植被稀疏的草坪草(平均占地块面积的26%),其次是木本植被茂密的区域(平均占地块面积的21%)。木本植被稀疏的草坪草区域中胸径大于50厘米的树木比木本植被茂密的区域更多。利用航空照片判读,我们将碳储量扩大到社区层面。不同社区类型的碳储量差异源于不透水面积(占地块面积的8 - 26%)和木本植被茂密区域面积(占11 - 28%)的不同。对不同社区类型的面积进行平均并相乘后,远郊居住用地植被中的碳含量为5240 ± 865克/平方米,对大树高度敏感,土壤中的碳含量为13800 ± 1290克/平方米(基于综合采样和建模方法)。这些含量高于该地区的农业用地,但低于成熟林分。与成熟森林相比,远郊土地灌木更多,倒下的木质碎屑更少,胸径达40厘米以下的树木大小类分布相似,但更大尺寸类别的树木要少得多。如果树木继续生长,远郊居住用地在数十年内可能会封存更多碳。远郊居住用地中碳储存的模式和过程受到影响土壤和植被的土地管理实践的驱动,反映了设计师、开发商和居民的选择。本研究提供了一个人类介导的耦合人类 - 自然系统中碳储存的实例。