Suppr超能文献

碳的得失:亚利桑那州凤凰城多种土地利用方式下的植被与碳权衡研究。

Carbon lost and carbon gained: a study of vegetation and carbon trade-offs among diverse land uses in Phoenix, Arizona.

机构信息

Department of Ecosystem Science and Sustainability, Colorado State University, 1476 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO, 80523-1476, USA.

Department of Animal, Plant, and Environmental Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, 1 Jan Smuts Avenue, Johannesburg, South Africa.

出版信息

Ecol Appl. 2017 Mar;27(2):644-661. doi: 10.1002/eap.1472.

Abstract

Human modification and management of urban landscapes drastically alters vegetation and soils, thereby altering carbon (C) storage and rates of net primary productivity (NPP). Complex social and ecological processes drive vegetation cover in cities, leading to heterogeneity in C dynamics depending on regional climate, land use, and land cover. Recent work has demonstrated homogenization in ecological processes within human-dominated landscapes (the urban convergence hypothesis) in soils and biotic communities. However, a lack of information on vegetation in arid land cities has hindered an understanding of potential C storage and NPP convergence across a diversity of ecosystem types. We estimated C storage and NPP of trees and shrubs for six different land-use types in the arid metropolis of Phoenix, Arizona, USA, and compared those results to native desert ecosystems, as well as other urban and natural systems around the world. Results from Phoenix do not support the convergence hypothesis. In particular, C storage in urban trees and shrubs was 42% of that found in desert vegetation, while NPP was only 20% of the total NPP estimated for comparable natural ecosystems. Furthermore, the overall estimates of C storage and NPP associated with urban trees in the CAP ecosystem were much lower (8-63%) than the other cities included in this analysis. We also found that C storage (175.25-388.94 g/m ) and NPP (8.07-15.99 g·m ·yr ) were dominated by trees in the urban residential land uses, while in the desert, shrubs were the primary source for pools (183.65 g/m ) and fluxes (6.51 g·m ·yr ). These results indicate a trade-off between shrubs and trees in arid ecosystems, with shrubs playing a major role in overall C storage and NPP in deserts and trees serving as the dominant C pool in cities. Our research supports current literature that calls for the development of spatially explicit and standardized methods for analyzing C dynamics associated with vegetation in urbanizing areas.

摘要

人类对城市景观的改造和管理极大地改变了植被和土壤,从而改变了碳 (C) 储存和净初级生产力 (NPP) 的速率。复杂的社会和生态过程驱动着城市的植被覆盖,导致 C 动态的异质性取决于区域气候、土地利用和土地覆盖。最近的研究表明,在人类主导的景观中,生态过程出现了同质化(城市趋同假说),表现在土壤和生物群落中。然而,由于缺乏对干旱地区城市植被的信息,人们无法理解潜在的 C 储存和 NPP 在多种生态系统类型中的趋同。我们估计了美国亚利桑那州凤凰城的六种不同土地利用类型的树木和灌木的 C 储存和 NPP,并将这些结果与原生沙漠生态系统以及世界其他城市和自然系统进行了比较。凤凰城的结果并不支持趋同假说。特别是,城市树木和灌木的 C 储存量仅为沙漠植被的 42%,而 NPP 仅为可比自然生态系统估计的总 NPP 的 20%。此外,CAP 生态系统中与城市树木相关的 C 储存和 NPP 的总体估计值(8-63%)远低于本分析中包含的其他城市。我们还发现,C 储存(175.25-388.94 g/m )和 NPP(8.07-15.99 g·m ·yr )主要由城市住宅用地中的树木决定,而在沙漠中,灌木是库(183.65 g/m )和通量(6.51 g·m ·yr )的主要来源。这些结果表明,在干旱生态系统中,灌木和树木之间存在权衡,灌木在沙漠的整体 C 储存和 NPP 中起着主要作用,而树木在城市中则是主要的 C 库。我们的研究支持了当前的文献,呼吁开发空间明确和标准化的方法来分析与城市化地区植被相关的 C 动态。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验