Blanchette Marc-André, Rivard Michèle, Dionne Clermont E, Hogg-Johnson Sheilah, Steenstra Ivan
Public Health PhD Program, School of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Oct 18;17(1):428. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1298-y.
Few studies have compared the factors that drive patients' decision to choose a chiropractor, physician or physiotherapist as their first healthcare provider for occupational back pain. The purpose of this study is to identify characteristics associated with the choice of first healthcare provider seen for acute uncomplicated occupational back pain.
We analyzed data collected by the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board from a cohort of workers with compensated back pain in 2005 in Ontario (Canada). Multivariable logistic regression models were created to identify factors associated with the type of first healthcare provider seen (chiropractor, physician, or physiotherapist). Adjustments to the final models were evaluated using the area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (ROC).
According to the 5520 analyzed claims, 85.3 % of the patients saw a physician, 11.4 % saw a chiropractor, and 3.2 % saw a physiotherapist. Longer job tenure (odds ratio (OR) = 1.02, P = 0.004), higher gross personal income (OR = 1.06, P = 0.018), mixed-manual job (OR = 1.35, P = 0.004) and previous similar injury (OR = 1.60, P < 0.001) increased the odds of seeing a chiropractor rather than a physician, while the size of the community (>500,000 inhabitants) and the availability of an early return to work program in the workplace (OR = 0.77, P = 0.035) decreased it. The odds of seeing a physiotherapist rather than a physician increased with increasing age (OR = 1.19, P = 0.019), previous similar injury (OR = 1.71, P < 0.001) and severity of injury (OR = 2.03, P = 0.010). Increased age (OR = 1.28, P = 0.008) and size of community (>1,500,000 inhabitants; OR = 2.58, P = 0.002) increased the odds of seeing a physiotherapist rather than a chiropractor, while holding a mixed-manual job significantly decreased those odds (OR = 0.63, P = 0.044). The area under the ROC curve of our multivariable models varied from 0.62 to 0.64.
The type of first healthcare provider sought for occupational back pain is influenced by injury-and work-related factors and by the worker's age, income and community size. Contrary to previous studies, the workers who first sought a physician did not have higher odds of having a severe injury.
很少有研究比较促使患者决定选择脊椎按摩师、医生或物理治疗师作为职业性背痛首选医疗服务提供者的因素。本研究的目的是确定与急性单纯性职业性背痛首选医疗服务提供者的选择相关的特征。
我们分析了加拿大安大略省工作场所安全与保险委员会于2005年从一组有补偿性背痛的工人中收集的数据。创建多变量逻辑回归模型以确定与首选医疗服务提供者类型(脊椎按摩师、医生或物理治疗师)相关的因素。使用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)下的面积评估最终模型的调整情况。
根据5520份分析索赔,85.3%的患者看医生,11.4%看脊椎按摩师,3.2%看物理治疗师。较长的工作任期(优势比(OR)=1.02,P=0.004)、较高的个人总收入(OR=1.06,P=0.018)、混合体力工作(OR=1.35,P=0.004)和既往类似损伤(OR=1.60,P<0.001)增加了看脊椎按摩师而非医生的几率,而社区规模(>50万居民)和工作场所早期重返工作计划的可用性(OR=0.77,P=0.035)则降低了这一几率。看物理治疗师而非医生的几率随着年龄增加(OR=1.19,P=0.019)、既往类似损伤(OR=1.71,P<0.001)和损伤严重程度(OR=2.03,P=0.010)而增加。年龄增加(OR=1.28,P=0.008)和社区规模(>150万居民;OR=2.58,P=0.002)增加了看物理治疗师而非脊椎按摩师的几率,而从事混合体力工作则显著降低了这些几率(OR=0.63,P=0.044)。我们多变量模型的ROC曲线下面积在0.62至0.64之间。
职业性背痛首选医疗服务提供者的类型受损伤和工作相关因素以及工人的年龄、收入和社区规模影响。与先前研究相反,首先寻求医生治疗的工人遭受重伤的几率并不更高。