Swanson F J, Franklin J F
Ecol Appl. 1992 Aug;2(3):262-274. doi: 10.2307/1941860.
Forest management practices on Federal lands in the Pacific Northwest of the United States have been the center of intense controversy. Conflicting value systems, new information, and new perspectives have fueled the debate over the balance between timber production and preservation of natural ecosystems. In this paper we consider examples from three aspects of forest management: (1) management of forest stands, (2) management of the patchwork of forest stands at the landscape scale, and (3) management of streams and riparian networks. In each of these cases we examine: management practices and perspectives of the recent past, findings from ecosystem research that are leading to change in those practices, resulting changes in management practices, and future research directions. We also suggest a path for future change, including systems for managing in the face of uncertainty. Results of research in natural and managed forest and stream ecosystems have been pivotal in reassessment and redesign of management practices to provide a broader range of management options for society to consider. Results of studies of natural disturbance processes and their effects are used as reference points for management systems intending to sustain biological diversity and ecosystem productivity. Stand management practices, for example, are being modified to retain some live trees and greater amounts of dead woody debris, both standing and down, in areas that would instead be clear-cut under intensive plantation forestry practices. The motivations for these modified practices are to sustain biological diversity, including key wildlife species, and to maintain soil productivity. Models of alternative forest-cutting patterns at a landscape scale are being used to examine their effects on ecosystem structure and function. One result of this analysis has been to shift from the previous system of dispersing cutting units to a system involving greater aggregation of units using designs to provide for species preferring forest interior habitat as well as species favoring edge and early seral habitats. As a result of ecosystem research, the management of stream and riparian networks can now be based on understanding of forest-stream interactions and designed within a drainage-basin context. Overall, emphasis in research and management seems to be in early stages of shifting from featured species-e.g., Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) and Northern Spotted Owl (Strix occidentalis caurina)-to ecosystems, and from the scale of forest stands to landscapes and the entire region. In addition to the contributions of ecosystem research to redesign of management techniques, ecosystem scientists also have roles in the social processes for determining the future course of management of natural resources. An important medium for scientist participation is establishment of adaptive management programs, in which management activities are conducted as experiments to test hypotheses and to develop information needed for future natural resource management.
美国太平洋西北地区联邦土地上的森林管理实践一直是激烈争议的焦点。相互冲突的价值体系、新信息和新观点加剧了关于木材生产与自然生态系统保护之间平衡的争论。在本文中,我们从森林管理的三个方面考虑实例:(1)林分管理,(2)景观尺度上林分斑块的管理,以及(3)溪流和河岸网络的管理。在每种情况下,我们研究:近期的管理实践和观点、导致这些实践发生变化的生态系统研究结果、管理实践的相应变化以及未来的研究方向。我们还提出了未来变革的路径,包括面对不确定性时的管理系统。自然和人工管理的森林及溪流生态系统的研究结果对于重新评估和重新设计管理实践至关重要,以便为社会提供更广泛的管理选项以供考虑。自然干扰过程及其影响的研究结果被用作旨在维持生物多样性和生态系统生产力的管理系统的参考点。例如,林分管理实践正在被修改,以便在原本会采用集约人工林经营方式进行皆伐的区域保留一些活树以及更多数量的枯立木和倒下的枯木。这些修改后的实践的动机是维持生物多样性,包括关键野生动物物种,并保持土壤生产力。正在使用景观尺度上替代森林砍伐模式的模型来研究它们对生态系统结构和功能的影响。这一分析的一个结果是从先前分散砍伐单元的系统转变为一个涉及使用设计使单元更大程度聚集的系统,以提供适合森林内部栖息地物种以及偏好边缘和早期演替栖息地物种的生存环境。由于生态系统研究,溪流和河岸网络的管理现在可以基于对森林与溪流相互作用的理解,并在流域背景下进行设计。总体而言,研究和管理的重点似乎正处于从特色物种(如道格拉斯冷杉(Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco)和北方斑点鸮(Strix occidentalis caurina))向生态系统转变的早期阶段,以及从林分尺度向景观和整个区域转变的早期阶段。除了生态系统研究对管理技术重新设计的贡献外,生态系统科学家在决定自然资源管理未来走向的社会过程中也发挥着作用。科学家参与的一个重要媒介是建立适应性管理计划,在该计划中,管理活动作为实验来检验假设并开发未来自然资源管理所需的信息。