Suppr超能文献

治疗后永久性固位的变化。

Post-treatment changes in permanent retention.

作者信息

Wolf Michael, Schulte U, Küpper K, Bourauel C, Keilig L, Papageorgiou S N, Dirk C, Kirschneck C, Daratsianos N, Jäger A

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, University of Bonn, Welschnonnenstrasse 17, 53111, Bonn, Germany.

Department of Orthodontics, University of Jena, Jena, Germany.

出版信息

J Orofac Orthop. 2016 Nov;77(6):446-453. doi: 10.1007/s00056-016-0054-0. Epub 2016 Oct 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

While permanent retention is today the method of choice to stabilize orthodontic treatment outcomes, recent studies have increasingly reported posttreatment changes in tooth position during permanent retention. We conducted this study to analyze changes in the anterior mandible, whether the changes follow an underlying movement pattern, and, aiming for a preventive strategy, whether any risk factors could be identified comparing findings with the pretreatment situations.

METHODS

We included 30 patients who had worn fixed Twistflex retainers (UK 3-3) extending from canine to canine in the mandible. Casts reflecting the intraoral situations before orthodontic treatment (T0), directly after completion of active therapy (T1), and 6 months later (T2) were scanned and superimposed using Imageware Surfacer software. Posttreatment changes (T2-T1) of tooth position within the retainer block were analyzed on 3D virtual models and were compared to pretreatment (T0) and treatment-related (T1-T0) findings to identify potential risk factors.

RESULTS

Almost all analyzed patients revealed three-dimensional changes in tooth position within the retainer block. Comparing these movements, we repeatedly found rotated retainer blocks in labio-oral direction, while the center of rotation was located at the first incisors. This pattern was associated with intercanine expansion and excessive overjet correction during orthodontic treatment. The canines underwent the most pronounced (rotational and translational) movements.

CONCLUSIONS

In general permanent lingual retainers are safe but in special clinical cases retainers can induce undesired tooth movement. Risk factors seem to be intercanine expansion and excessive overjet correction during orthodontic treatment. In specific cases an additional retention device might be needed.

摘要

目的

虽然永久保持是目前稳定正畸治疗效果的首选方法,但最近的研究越来越多地报道了永久保持期间牙齿位置的治疗后变化。我们开展这项研究以分析下颌前部的变化,这些变化是否遵循潜在的移动模式,并且为了制定预防策略,通过将研究结果与治疗前情况进行比较,确定是否存在任何风险因素。

方法

我们纳入了30例佩戴下颌从尖牙到尖牙的固定Twistflex保持器(英国3 - 3)的患者。对反映正畸治疗前(T0)、积极治疗刚结束时(T1)以及6个月后(T2)口腔内情况的模型进行扫描,并使用Imageware Surfacer软件进行叠加。在三维虚拟模型上分析保持器区域内牙齿位置的治疗后变化(T2 - T1),并与治疗前(T0)以及与治疗相关的(T1 - T0)结果进行比较,以确定潜在风险因素。

结果

几乎所有分析的患者在保持器区域内都出现了牙齿位置的三维变化。比较这些移动时,我们反复发现保持器区域在唇向 - 口腔方向旋转,而旋转中心位于第一颗切牙处。这种模式与正畸治疗期间尖牙间扩弓和过度覆盖矫正有关。尖牙经历了最明显的(旋转和平移)移动。

结论

一般来说,永久性舌侧保持器是安全的,但在特殊临床病例中,保持器可能会导致不期望的牙齿移动。风险因素似乎是正畸治疗期间的尖牙间扩弓和过度覆盖矫正。在特定情况下,可能需要额外的保持装置。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验