Suppr超能文献

体重和性别对用于测量呼气末肺容积的呼吸磁力计准确性的影响。

The effect of body mass and sex on the accuracy of respiratory magnetometers for measurement of end-expiratory lung volumes.

作者信息

Avraam Joanne, Bourke Rosie, Trinder John, Nicholas Christian L, Brazzale Danny, O'Donoghue Fergal J, Rochford Peter D, Jordan Amy S

机构信息

Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine and Institute for Breathing and Sleep, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia; and.

出版信息

J Appl Physiol (1985). 2016 Nov 1;121(5):1169-1177. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00571.2016. Epub 2016 Oct 7.

Abstract

Respiratory magnetometers are increasingly being used in sleep studies to measure changes in end-expiratory lung volume (EELV), including in obese obstructive sleep apnea patients. Despite this, the accuracy of magnetometers has not been confirmed in obese patients nor compared between sexes. Thus we compared spirometer-measured and magnetometer-estimated lung volume and tidal volume changes during voluntary end-expiratory lung volume changes of 1.5, 1, and 0.5 l above and 0.5 l below functional respiratory capacity in supine normal-weight [body mass index (BMI) < 25 kg/m] and healthy obese (BMI > 30 kg/m) men and women. Two different magnetometer calibration techniques proposed by Banzett et al. [Banzett RB, Mahan ST, Garner DM, Brughera A, Loring SH. J Appl Physiol (1985) 79: 2169-2176, 1995] and Sackner et al. [Sackner MA, Watson H, Belsito AS, Feinerman D, Suarez M, Gonzalez G, Bizousky F, Krieger B. J Appl Physiol (1985) 66: 410-420, 1989] were assessed. Across all groups and target volumes, magnetometers overestimated spirometer-measured EELV by ~65 ml (<0.001) with no difference between techniques (0.07). The Banzett method overestimated the spirometer EELV change in normal-weight women for all target volumes except +0.5 l, whereas no differences between mass or sex groups were observed for the Sackner technique. The variability of breath-to-breath measures of EELV was significantly higher for obese compared with nonobese subjects and was higher for the Sackner than Banzett technique. On the other hand, for tidal volume, both calibration techniques underestimated spirometer measurements (<0.001), with the underestimation being more marked for the Banzett than Sackner technique (0.03), in obese than normal weight (<0.001) and in men than in women (0.003). These results indicate that both body mass and sex affect the accuracy of respiratory magnetometers in measuring EELV and tidal volume.

摘要

呼吸磁力计越来越多地用于睡眠研究,以测量呼气末肺容积(EELV)的变化,包括肥胖阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者。尽管如此,磁力计在肥胖患者中的准确性尚未得到证实,也未在性别之间进行比较。因此,我们比较了在仰卧位正常体重[体重指数(BMI)<25kg/m²]和健康肥胖(BMI>30kg/m²)的男性和女性中,在功能呼吸容量以上1.5、1和0.5升以及以下0.5升的自愿呼气末肺容积变化期间,肺活量计测量的和磁力计估计的肺容积及潮气量变化。评估了Banzett等人[Banzett RB, Mahan ST, Garner DM, Brughera A, Loring SH. J Appl Physiol (1985) 79: 2169 - 2176, 1995]和Sackner等人[Sackner MA, Watson H, Belsito AS, Feinerman D, Suarez M, Gonzalez G, Bizousky F, Krieger B. J Appl Physiol (1985) 66: 410 - 420, 1989]提出的两种不同的磁力计校准技术。在所有组和目标容积中,磁力计高估了肺活量计测量的EELV约65毫升(<0.001)与技术之间无差异(0.07)。Banzett方法在除+0.5升外的所有目标容积中高估了正常体重女性的肺活量计EELV变化,而Sackner技术在体重或性别组之间未观察到差异。与非肥胖受试者相比,肥胖受试者EELV的逐次呼吸测量变异性显著更高,且Sackner技术比Banzett技术更高。另一方面,对于潮气量,两种校准技术均低估了肺活量计测量值(<0.001),Banzett技术比Sackner技术的低估更明显(0.03),肥胖者比正常体重者更明显(<0.001),男性比女性更明显(<0.003)。这些结果表明,体重和性别均会影响呼吸磁力计测量EELV和潮气量的准确性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验