Acar Ahmet Hüseyin, Alan Hilal, Özgür Cem, Vardi Nigar, Asutay Fatih, Güler Çiğdem
*Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul†Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Inonu University, Malatya‡Private Practice, Çorlu§Department of Histology and Embriology, Faculty of Medicine, Inonu University, Malatya||Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyon¶Department of Pedodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ordu University, Ordu, Turkey.
J Craniofac Surg. 2016 Oct;27(7):1879-1883. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002932.
This study aims to evaluate the possible effect of more cortical bone decortication (CBD) on guided bone augmentation. A total of 16 New Zealand rabbits and 32 titanium domes were used. No cortical bone decortication was applied to the control group and in the study groups, the cortical bones were decorticated with a round burr (Group A: 1 hole with bleeding, Group B: 5 holes with bleeding, Group C: a thin layer of compact bone was completely removed with no bleeding). Then 2 titanium domes were placed on the calvarium of each rabbit with hydroxyapatite/beta-tricalcium phosphate. After 3 months, the animals were sacrificed and specimens were sent for histological and histomorphometric analysis. Histological and histomorphometric analysis showed that bone decortication with burr significantly increased new bone regeneration in all the experimental groups compared with the control group (P <0.05). No statistically significant difference was determined between the study groups. In conclusion, CBD, which has no negative impact on surgery, has a positive effect on guided bone augmentation. However, a greater amount of CBD does not have a greater effect.