Schiller Joerg, Korallus Christoph, Bethge Matthias, Karst Matthias, Schmalhofer Marie-Lena, Gutenbrunner Christoph, Fink Matthias Georg
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30655, Hannover, Germany.
Institute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Section Rehabilitation and Work, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Arch Osteoporos. 2016 Dec;11(1):34. doi: 10.1007/s11657-016-0288-x. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
In this sham-controlled study, 53 patients received 10 sessions of acupuncture treatment over 5 weeks to investigate the effects of acupuncture on the pain and quality of life of patients with osteoporosis. The results showed significant favorable effects of verum acupuncture on quality of life. Both interventions showed sustained and clinically relevant effects on pain.
Standard analgesic treatment is associated with adverse events in patients with osteoporosis, especially elderly and/or comorbid patients. As acupuncture has gained widespread acceptance as a complementary treatment modality with few side effects, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of acupuncture on the pain and quality of life of patients with osteoporosis.
In total, 53 patients with vertebral compression fractures, osteoporosis-associated spinal deformities, and resultant pain were randomly allocated to the verum acupuncture with deep needling of specific points following the principles of traditional Chinese medicine (n = 29) or control acupuncture group with superficial needling of non-acupuncture points (n = 24). All patients received 10 sessions of standardized verum or control acupuncture treatment over 5 weeks. Pain (VAS score 1-100) and quality of life (QUALEFFO-41) were measured at the start of treatment (T0), before each acupuncture session (T1), and at 1 (T2) and 3 months (T3) post-treatment.
Both acupuncture treatments significantly reduced activity-related pain and pain at rest over time. The verum acupuncture group experienced a significantly greater reduction in mean pain intensity at rest than the control group. In the control group, quality of life improved only temporarily post-treatment (T2) and slightly declined at the end of the follow-up period (T3). In contrast, patients in the verum acupuncture group experienced continuous and significant improvements in quality of life up to 3 months after treatment (T3).
Both types of acupuncture were equally effective in producing sustained, clinically relevant pain relief in patients with osteoporosis. Verum acupuncture had stronger and longer-lasting effects on quality of life and pain at rest. The possible reasons for these findings include the specificity of acupuncture point selection and the performance of needle stimulation.
在这项假手术对照研究中,53名患者在5周内接受了10次针刺治疗,以研究针刺对骨质疏松症患者疼痛和生活质量的影响。结果显示,真针刺对生活质量有显著的有益效果。两种干预措施对疼痛均有持续且具有临床意义的效果。
标准镇痛治疗与骨质疏松症患者的不良事件相关,尤其是老年和/或合并其他疾病的患者。由于针刺作为一种副作用较少的辅助治疗方式已得到广泛认可,本研究的目的是评估针刺对骨质疏松症患者疼痛和生活质量的影响。
总共53例患有椎体压缩性骨折、骨质疏松相关脊柱畸形及由此导致疼痛的患者,按照中医原则被随机分配到真针刺组(对特定穴位进行深刺,n = 29)或对照针刺组(对非穴位进行浅刺,n = 24)。所有患者在超过5周的时间内接受10次标准化的真针刺或对照针刺治疗。在治疗开始时(T0)、每次针刺治疗前(T1)以及治疗后1个月(T2)和3个月(T3)测量疼痛(视觉模拟评分法[VAS]评分1 - 100)和生活质量(QUALEFFO - 41)。
随着时间推移,两种针刺治疗均显著减轻了与活动相关的疼痛和静息时的疼痛。真针刺组静息时的平均疼痛强度降低幅度显著大于对照组。在对照组中,生活质量仅在治疗后(T2)暂时改善,在随访期结束时(T3)略有下降。相比之下,真针刺组患者在治疗后长达3个月(T3)的时间里生活质量持续且显著改善。
两种类型的针刺在为骨质疏松症患者提供持续的、具有临床意义的疼痛缓解方面同样有效。真针刺对生活质量和静息时的疼痛具有更强且更持久的效果。这些发现的可能原因包括穴位选择的特异性和针刺刺激的实施方式。