Voglar Matej, Wamerdam Jeffrey, Kingma Idsart, Sarabon Nejc, van Dieën Jaap H
University of Primorska, Andrej Marušič Institute, Koper, Slovenia.
MOVE Research Institute Amsterdam, Department of Human Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 21;11(10):e0162703. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162703. eCollection 2016.
The goal of the present study was to determine the effects of prolonged, intermittent flexion on trunk neuromuscular control. Furthermore, the potential beneficial effects of passive upper body support during flexion were investigated. Twenty one healthy young volunteers participated during two separate visits in which they performed 1 hour of intermittent 60 seconds flexion and 30 seconds rest cycles. Flexion was set at 80% lumbar flexion and was performed with or without upper body support. Before and after intermittent flexion exposure, lumbar range of motion was measured using inertial measurement units and trunk stability was assessed during perturbations applied in the forward direction with a force controlled actuator. Closed-loop system identification was used to determine the trunk translational admittance and reflexes as frequency response functions. The admittance describes the actuator displacement as a function of contact force and to assess reflexes muscle activation was related to actuator displacement. Trunk admittance gain decreased after unsupported flexion, while reflex gain and lumbar range of motion increased after both conditions. Significant interaction effects confirmed a larger increase in lumbar range of motion and reflex gains at most frequencies analysed following unsupported flexion in comparison to supported flexion, probably compensating for decreased passive tissue stiffness. In contrast with some previous studies we found that prolonged intermittent flexion decreased trunk admittance, which implies an increase of the lumped intrinsic and reflexive stiffness. This would compensate for decreased stiffness at the cost of an increase in cumulative low back load. Taking into account the differences between conditions it would be preferable to offer upper body support during activities that require prolonged trunk flexion.
本研究的目的是确定长时间间歇性屈曲对躯干神经肌肉控制的影响。此外,还研究了屈曲过程中被动上身支撑的潜在有益效果。21名健康的年轻志愿者在两次单独的就诊中参与了研究,他们进行了1小时的间歇性60秒屈曲和30秒休息循环。屈曲设定为腰椎屈曲的80%,并在有或没有上身支撑的情况下进行。在间歇性屈曲暴露前后,使用惯性测量单元测量腰椎活动范围,并在向前方向用测力控制执行器施加扰动时评估躯干稳定性。使用闭环系统识别来确定躯干平移导纳和作为频率响应函数的反射。导纳描述了执行器位移作为接触力的函数,并评估与执行器位移相关的反射肌肉激活。无支撑屈曲后躯干导纳增益降低,而在两种情况下反射增益和腰椎活动范围均增加。显著的交互作用效应证实,与有支撑屈曲相比,无支撑屈曲后在大多数分析频率下腰椎活动范围和反射增益的增加更大,这可能是为了补偿被动组织刚度的降低。与之前的一些研究不同,我们发现长时间间歇性屈曲会降低躯干导纳,这意味着集中的固有和反射刚度增加。这将以累积下背部负荷增加为代价来补偿刚度的降低。考虑到不同条件之间的差异,在需要长时间躯干屈曲的活动中提供上身支撑可能更可取。