Kesselheim Aaron S, Eddings Wesley, Raj Tara, Campbell Eric G, Franklin Jessica M, Ross Kathryn M, Fulchino Lisa A, Avorn Jerry, Gagne Joshua J
Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Mongan Institute for Health Policy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 21;11(10):e0163339. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163339. eCollection 2016.
Generic drugs are cost-effective versions of brand-name drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) following proof of pharmaceutical equivalence and bioequivalence. Generic drugs are widely prescribed by physicians, although there is disagreement over the clinical comparability of generic drugs to brand-name drugs within the physician community. The objective of this survey was to assess physicians' perceptions of generic drugs and the generic drug approval process.
A survey was administered to a national sample of primary care internists and specialists between August 2014 and January 2015. In total, 1,152 physicians comprising of internists with no reported specialty certification and those with specialty certification in hematology, infectious diseases, and endocrinology were surveyed. The survey assessed physicians' perceptions of the FDA's generic drug approval process, as well as their experiences prescribing six generic drugs approved between 2008 and 2012 using product-specific approval pathways and selected comparator drugs. Among 718 respondents (62% response rate), a majority were comfortable with the FDA's process in ensuring the safety and effectiveness of generic drugs overall (91%) and with letting the FDA determine which tests were necessary to determine bioequivalence in a particular drug (92%). A minority (13-26%) still reported being uncomfortable prescribing generic drugs approved using product-specific pathways. Overall, few physicians heard reports of concerns about generic versions of the study drugs or their comparators, with no differences between the two groups. Physicians tended to hear about concerns about the safety or effectiveness of generic drugs from patients, pharmacists, and physician colleagues.
Physicians hold largely positive views of the FDA's generic drug approval process even when some questioned the performance of certain generic drugs in comparison to brand-name drugs. Better education about the generic drug approval process and standards may alleviate concerns among the physician community and support the delivery of cost-effective health care.
仿制药是经美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的具有成本效益的品牌药版本,需证明其药学等效性和生物等效性。仿制药被医生广泛开出处方,尽管在医生群体中对于仿制药与品牌药的临床可比性存在分歧。本次调查的目的是评估医生对仿制药及仿制药审批流程的看法。
在2014年8月至2015年1月期间,对全国范围内的初级保健内科医生和专科医生样本进行了一项调查。总共对1152名医生进行了调查,其中包括未报告专业认证的内科医生以及血液学、传染病学和内分泌学专业认证的医生。该调查评估了医生对FDA仿制药审批流程的看法,以及他们使用特定产品审批途径开具2008年至2012年期间批准的六种仿制药和选定对照药物的经验。在718名受访者(62%的回复率)中,大多数人总体上对FDA确保仿制药安全性和有效性的流程感到满意(91%),并且对让FDA确定特定药物生物等效性所需的测试感到满意(92%)。少数人(13 - 26%)仍表示对使用特定产品途径批准的仿制药开出处方感到不舒服。总体而言,很少有医生听说过对研究药物或其对照药物仿制药版本的担忧报告,两组之间没有差异。医生倾向于从患者那里、药剂师和医生同事那里听说对仿制药安全性或有效性的担忧。
即使一些人质疑某些仿制药与品牌药相比的性能,医生对FDA的仿制药审批流程总体上仍持积极看法。对仿制药审批流程和标准进行更好的教育可能会减轻医生群体的担忧,并支持提供具有成本效益的医疗保健。