Aroney Christine, Fraser-Bell Samantha, Lamoureux Ecosse L, Gillies Mark C, Lim Lyndell L, Fenwick Eva K
The Save Sight and Eye Health Institute, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
The Centre for Eye Research, University of Melbourne, Royal Victoria Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Australia 3Singapore Eye Research Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore 4Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 Oct 1;57(13):5541-5546. doi: 10.1167/iovs.16-19729.
To determine the patient-centered effectiveness of treatment with the slow-release dexamethasone intravitreal implant (DEX implant) and intravitreal bevacizumab using the Impact of Vision Impairment Questionnaire (IVI), a vision-related quality of life (VRQoL) measure, in patients with visual impairment secondary to center-involving diabetic macular edema (DME).
Patients with DME were enrolled in a phase 2, prospective, multicenter, randomized, single-masked clinical trial and received either DEX implant 4 monthly or bevacizumab monthly, both pro re nata. Vision-related quality of life was measured at baseline and 24 months, using the IVI's three component scales, namely reading, mobility, and emotional well-being. Rasch analysis was used to generate interval-level estimates of VRQoL, which were then analyzed using t-tests to assess changes over time.
Forty-eight patients completed the main study; 43 (90%) answered the IVI at the baseline and 24-month (final efficacy) visits. Vision-related quality of life improved significantly, with average increases of 1.44, 0.99, and 1.49 logits, for the reading, mobility, and emotional well-being scales respectively, from baseline to 24 months, (P < 0.001). There was no significant between-group difference in improvement in VRQoL in the DEX implant only compared with the bevacizumab-only group, in any of the three scales listed above (with 1.41, 1.08, and 2.11 logits improvement, in reading, mobility, and emotional well-being, respectively, for DEX implant group, compared with 1.48, 1.06, and 2.11 for bevacizumab; P values > 0.1.).
We found that both DEX implant and bevacizumab treatment result in significant and similar improvements in VRQoL in patients with DME over a 24-month period. (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01298076).
使用视力损害影响问卷(IVI),一种与视力相关的生活质量(VRQoL)测量工具,确定缓释地塞米松玻璃体内植入物(DEX植入物)和玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗治疗对累及黄斑中心凹的糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)所致视力损害患者以患者为中心的疗效。
DME患者被纳入一项2期、前瞻性、多中心、随机、单盲临床试验,接受每4个月一次的DEX植入物或每月一次的贝伐单抗治疗,均按需给药。在基线和24个月时,使用IVI的三个分量表,即阅读、活动能力和情绪健康,测量与视力相关的生活质量。采用Rasch分析生成VRQoL的区间水平估计值,然后使用t检验进行分析,以评估随时间的变化。
48名患者完成了主要研究;43名(90%)在基线和24个月(最终疗效)访视时回答了IVI问卷。与视力相关的生活质量显著改善,从基线到24个月,阅读、活动能力和情绪健康量表的平均logit增加分别为1.44、0.99和1.49,(P<0.001)。在上述三个量表中的任何一个中,仅DEX植入物组与仅贝伐单抗组相比,VRQoL改善的组间差异均无统计学意义(DEX植入物组在阅读、活动能力和情绪健康方面的改善分别为1.41、1.08和2.11 logit,贝伐单抗组分别为1.48、1.06和2.11;P值>0.1)。
我们发现,在24个月的时间里,DEX植入物和贝伐单抗治疗均能使DME患者的VRQoL得到显著且相似的改善。(Clinicaltrials.gov标识符NCT01298076)