University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Dentistry and Oral Hygiene, Groningen, Department of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Biomaterials, Groningen, The Netherlands.
University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Groningen, The Netherlands.
J Dent. 2016 Dec;55:92-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.10.008. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
To assess the benefits of implant support to Removable Partial Dentures (RPD) in patients with a bilateral free-ending situation in the mandible and to determine the most favorable implant position: the premolar (PM) or the molar (M) region.
Thirty subjects with a bilateral unbounded posterior saddle received 2 PM and 2M implants. A new RPD was placed. Implant support was provided 3 months later. Two PM implants supported the RPD. After 3 months the 2M implants were used or vice versa. Outcome measures included oral health related quality of life (OHIP-NL49), general health status (SF-36), contentment assessed on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the number of hours that the RPD was worn. Data were collected prior to treatment, 3 months after having functioned with a new RPD and after 3 and 6 months with implant support. Finally, patients expressed their preferred implant position.
The general health status (SF-36) was not influenced. OHIP-NL49 values and mean wearing-time were statistical significantly more favorable for ISRPD's, regardless of the implant position. Per day, the ISRPD's were worn 2-3h more than the unsupported new RPD. Patients' expectations were met as the VAS-scores of anticipated and realized contentment did not reach a statistical significant level (p>0.05). VAS scores for ISRPD's with M implant support were higher than for PM implant support. Finally, 56.7% of subjects preferred the M implant support, 13.3% expressed no preference and 30% opted for PM implant support.
Mandibular implant support favorably influences oral health related patient-based outcome measures in patients with a bilateral free-ending situation. The majority of patients prefer the implant support to be in the molar region.
Patients with a bilateral free-ending situation in the mandible opposed by a maxillary denture benefit from implant support to their mandibular removable partial denture. Most patients prefer this support to be in the molar region.
评估在双侧游离端下颌骨的患者中,种植体支持对可摘局部义齿(RPD)的益处,并确定最有利的种植体位置:前磨牙(PM)或磨牙(M)区域。
30 名双侧无后鞍区的患者接受了 2 个 PM 和 2 个 M 种植体。放置了一个新的 RPD。3 个月后提供种植体支持。2 个 PM 种植体支撑 RPD。3 个月后,使用 2 个 M 种植体或反之亦然。评估指标包括口腔健康相关生活质量(OHIP-NL49)、一般健康状况(SF-36)、基于视觉模拟量表(VAS)的满意度以及 RPD 佩戴时间。数据在治疗前、佩戴新 RPD 3 个月后以及佩戴种植体支持 3 个月和 6 个月后收集。最后,患者表达了他们对种植体位置的偏好。
一般健康状况(SF-36)不受影响。无论种植体位置如何,ISRPD 的 OHIP-NL49 值和平均佩戴时间均具有统计学显著优势。每天,ISRPD 的佩戴时间比未佩戴种植体支持的新 RPD 多 2-3 小时。患者的期望得到了满足,因为预期和实现的满意度的 VAS 评分未达到统计学显著水平(p>0.05)。M 种植体支持的 ISRPD 的 VAS 评分高于 PM 种植体支持的 ISRPD。最后,56.7%的受试者更喜欢 M 种植体支持,13.3%表示没有偏好,30%选择 PM 种植体支持。
下颌骨双侧游离端患者,上颌义齿支持,种植体支持对口腔健康相关的患者为基础的结果测量有积极影响。大多数患者更喜欢在磨牙区域进行种植体支持。
双侧游离端下颌骨患者,上颌义齿支持,对其下颌可摘局部义齿进行种植体支持可获益。大多数患者更喜欢在磨牙区进行这种支持。