• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于腱性起源锤状指两步矫形治疗效果的随机对照试验。

A randomized controlled trial of the effect of 2-step orthosis treatment for a mallet finger of tendinous origin.

作者信息

Saito Kazuo, Kihara Hitoshi

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Center, Fuchinobe General Hospital, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan.

Kihara Orthopaedic Clinic, Saitama, Japan.

出版信息

J Hand Ther. 2016 Oct-Dec;29(4):433-439. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2016.07.005. Epub 2016 Oct 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.jht.2016.07.005
PMID:27769840
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

A randomized clinical trial, with patients treated either by new 2-step orthosis or by the figure-eight-type orthosis with the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint extended.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

To report on our new orthosis and to evaluate the treatment efficacy of using a 2-step orthosis for the treatment of a mallet finger of tendinous origin compared with a conventional orthosis.

METHODS

Forty-four patients were randomized into the 2-step or conventional orthosis groups. Primary outcomes were active DIP joint flexion and extensor lag, pain, and the Abouna-Brown criteria.

RESULTS

The 2-step orthosis was associated with a smaller active DIP extensor lag, compared with the conventional orthosis (-7.5 ± 4.5° vs -16.4 ± 6.9°, P = .001), combined with a significantly higher Abouna-Brown criteria (χ = 14.57, P = .01). No other between-group differences were identified.

CONCLUSION

The therapeutic effectiveness of the 2-step orthosis, over a conventional orthosis, was supported by a large effect size of the treatment in improving residual active extensor lag at the DIP and overall Abouna-Brown criteria. Our study thus suggested that the initial immobilization involved in new 2-step orthosis and is thus a good immobilization technique.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Ib.

摘要

研究设计

一项随机临床试验,患者分别接受新型两步矫形器治疗或远侧指间关节(DIP)伸展位的8字绷带矫形器治疗。

研究目的

报告我们的新型矫形器,并评估与传统矫形器相比,使用两步矫形器治疗腱性锤状指的治疗效果。

方法

44例患者被随机分为两步矫形器组或传统矫形器组。主要观察指标为DIP关节主动屈曲和伸肌滞后、疼痛以及阿布纳-布朗标准。

结果

与传统矫形器相比,两步矫形器的DIP关节主动伸肌滞后更小(-7.5±4.5°对-16.4±6.9°,P = 0.001),同时阿布纳-布朗标准显著更高(χ=14.57,P = 0.01)。未发现其他组间差异。

结论

两步矫形器在改善DIP关节残余主动伸肌滞后和总体阿布纳-布朗标准方面具有较大的治疗效应量,这支持了其优于传统矫形器的治疗效果。因此,我们的研究表明,新型两步矫形器所涉及的初始固定是一种良好的固定技术。

证据级别

Ib级。

相似文献

1
A randomized controlled trial of the effect of 2-step orthosis treatment for a mallet finger of tendinous origin.一项关于腱性起源锤状指两步矫形治疗效果的随机对照试验。
J Hand Ther. 2016 Oct-Dec;29(4):433-439. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2016.07.005. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
2
Comparison of four different immobilization methods in the treatment of tendinous mallet finger injury.四种不同固定方法治疗锤状指肌腱损伤的比较。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2021 May;27(3):356-361. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2021.35469.
3
Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing 3-Point Prefabricated Orthosis and Elastic Tape Versus Cast Immobilization for the Nonsurgical Management of Mallet Finger.前瞻性随机临床试验比较 3 点预制矫形器与弹性胶带与石膏固定治疗槌状指的非手术治疗。
J Hand Surg Am. 2023 Sep;48(9):951.e1-951.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.02.012. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
4
Long-term Stack splint immobilization for closed tendinous Mallet Finger.长期使用叠层夹板固定治疗闭合性锤状指肌腱损伤
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2020 Jun;52(3):170-175. doi: 10.1055/a-1170-6660. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
5
Comparative outcomes between surgical treatment and orthosis splint for mallet finger: a systematic review and meta-analysis.锤状指手术治疗与矫形支具治疗的比较结果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2023 Feb-Dec;57(1-6):54-63. doi: 10.1080/2000656X.2022.2164291. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
6
Comparison of Extension Orthosis Versus Percutaneous Pinning of the Distal Interphalangeal Joint for Closed Mallet Injuries.闭合性锤状指损伤中,远侧指间关节伸展支具与经皮穿针固定的比较
Ann Plast Surg. 2016 May;76(5):499-503. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000315.
7
Effectiveness of Quickcast Versus Custom-Fabricated Thermoplastic Orthosis Immobilization for the Treatment of Mallet Fingers: A Randomized Clinical Trial.快速铸造式热塑夹板与定制热塑夹板治疗锤状指的疗效比较:一项随机临床试验。
Hand (N Y). 2022 Nov;17(6):1090-1097. doi: 10.1177/1558944720988136. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
8
Management of stable proximal interphalangeal joint volar plate injuries with figure-of-8 orthoses: A parallel-group randomized controlled trial.使用 8 字形支具治疗稳定的近节指间关节掌板损伤:一项平行分组随机对照试验。
J Hand Ther. 2024 Jul-Sep;37(3):363-370. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2023.11.001. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
9
A novel way of treating mallet finger injuries.一种治疗锤状指损伤的新方法。
J Hand Ther. 2014 Oct-Dec;27(4):325-8; quiz 329. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2014.02.005. Epub 2014 Feb 24.
10
Two case reports-Use of relative motion orthoses to manage extensor tendon zones III and IV and sagittal band injuries in adjacent fingers.两例病例报告——使用相对运动矫形器治疗相邻手指的伸肌腱Ⅲ区和Ⅳ区及矢状带损伤
J Hand Ther. 2017 Oct-Dec;30(4):546-557. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2017.04.006. Epub 2017 Oct 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Orthosis Management Failure Rates for Mallet Injuries.锤状指损伤支具治疗失败率的比较
J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2022 May 13;4(4):220-225. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2022.04.003. eCollection 2022 Jul.