Hadjiconstantinou Michelle, Byrne Jo, Bodicoat Danielle H, Robertson Noelle, Eborall Helen, Khunti Kamlesh, Davies Melanie J
Diabetes Research Centre, Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Oct 21;18(10):e270. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5991.
Poor diabetes self-care can have a negative impact on psychological well-being and quality of life. Given the scarcity of traditional psychological support and the barriers to uptake of and attendance at face-to-face education programs, Web-based interventions are becoming a popular approach to provide an additional platform for psychological support in long-term conditions. However, there is limited evidence to assess the effect of Web-based psychological support in people with type 2 diabetes.
This systematic review is the first review to critically appraise and quantify the evidence on the effect of Web-based interventions that aim to improve well-being in people with type 2 diabetes.
Searches were carried out in the following electronic databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library. Reference lists were hand-searched. A meta-analysis was conducted for depression and distress outcomes.
A total of 16 randomized controlled studies met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review and 9 were included in the meta-analyses. Theories were applied to the majority of the interventions. The most common behavior change techniques were "General information" and "Tracking/monitoring." Interventions with a duration of 2-6 months providing professional-led support with asynchronous and synchronous communication appeared to be associated with significant well-being outcomes. The pooled mean (95% confidence interval) difference between the intervention and control arms at follow-up on depression score was -0.31 (-0.73 to 0.11). The pooled mean difference on distress scores at follow-up was -0.11 (-0.38 to 0.16). No significant improvements in depression (P=.15) or distress (P=.43) were found following meta-analyses.
While the meta-analyses demonstrated nonsignificant results for depression and distress scores, this review has shown that there is a potential for Web-based interventions to improve well-being outcomes in type 2 diabetes. Further research is required to confirm the findings of this review.
糖尿病自我管理不善会对心理健康和生活质量产生负面影响。鉴于传统心理支持的匮乏以及参加面对面教育项目存在的障碍,基于网络的干预措施正成为一种为长期疾病患者提供额外心理支持平台的流行方法。然而,评估基于网络的心理支持对2型糖尿病患者效果的证据有限。
本系统评价是首次对旨在改善2型糖尿病患者幸福感的基于网络的干预措施效果的证据进行批判性评价和量化。
在以下电子数据库中进行检索:医学文献数据库(MEDLINE)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(EMBASE)、护理学与健康领域数据库(CINAHL)、心理学文摘数据库(PsycINFO)和考科蓝图书馆。对手动检索参考文献列表。对抑郁和痛苦结局进行荟萃分析。
共有16项随机对照研究符合该系统评价的纳入标准,其中9项纳入荟萃分析。大多数干预措施都应用了理论。最常见的行为改变技术是“一般信息”和“跟踪/监测”。持续2至6个月、提供专业指导支持且具备异步和同步沟通的干预措施似乎与显著的幸福感结局相关。随访时干预组与对照组抑郁评分的合并平均差(95%置信区间)为-0.31(-0.73至0.11)。随访时痛苦评分的合并平均差为-0.11(-0.38至0.16)。荟萃分析后未发现抑郁(P = 0.15)或痛苦(P = 0.43)有显著改善。
虽然荟萃分析显示抑郁和痛苦评分无显著结果,但本评价表明基于网络的干预措施有可能改善2型糖尿病患者的幸福感结局。需要进一步研究来证实本评价的结果。