Department of Oncology and Hematology, "S.Orsola-Malpighi" University Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, "S.Orsola-Malpighi" University Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Am J Hematol. 2017 Jan;92(1):82-87. doi: 10.1002/ajh.24591. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) treatment is based on company-sponsored and academic trials testing different tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as first-line therapy. These studies included patients selected according to many inclusion-exclusion criteria, particularly age and comorbidities, with specific treatment obligations. In daily clinical practice (real-life), inclusion-exclusion criteria do not exist, and the treatment outcome does not only depend on the choice of first-line TKI but also on second- and third-line TKIs. To investigate in a real-life setting the response and the outcome on first-line imatinib, with switch to second generation TKIs in case of unsatisfying response or intolerance, we analyzed all newly diagnosed patients (N = 236), living in two Italian regions, registered in a prospective study according to population-based criteria and treated front-line with imatinib. A switch from imatinib to second-generation TKIs was reported in 14% of patients for side effects and in 24% for failure or suboptimal response, with an improvement of molecular response in 57% of them. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and leukemia-related survival (LRS) were 85% and 93%, respectively; the 4-year rates of MR and MR were 75% and 48%, respectively. Cardiovascular complications were reported in 4% of patients treated with imatinib alone and in 6% of patients receiving nilotinib as second-line. Older age (≥70 years) affected OS, but not LRS. These data provide an unbiased reference on the CML management and on the results of TKI treatment in real-life, according to ELN recommendations, using imatinib as first-line treatment and second-generation TKIs as second-line therapy. Am. J. Hematol. 92:82-87, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
慢性髓性白血病(CML)的治疗基于公司赞助和学术试验,这些试验测试了不同的酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)作为一线治疗药物。这些研究纳入了根据许多纳入排除标准选择的患者,特别是年龄和合并症,具有特定的治疗义务。在日常临床实践(真实世界)中,不存在纳入排除标准,治疗结果不仅取决于一线 TKI 的选择,还取决于二线和三线 TKI。为了在真实环境中研究一线伊马替尼的反应和结果,如果反应不满意或不耐受,则切换至第二代 TKI,我们分析了所有新诊断的患者(N=236),他们居住在意大利的两个地区,根据基于人群的标准在一项前瞻性研究中注册,并接受一线伊马替尼治疗。由于副作用,14%的患者需要从伊马替尼转换为第二代 TKI,由于失败或反应不佳,24%的患者需要转换,其中 57%的患者分子反应得到改善。5 年总生存率(OS)和白血病相关生存率(LRS)分别为 85%和 93%;4 年的 MR 和 MR 率分别为 75%和 48%。单独接受伊马替尼治疗的患者中有 4%出现心血管并发症,接受尼洛替尼作为二线治疗的患者中有 6%出现心血管并发症。年龄较大(≥70 岁)影响 OS,但不影响 LRS。这些数据根据 ELN 建议,提供了关于 CML 管理和 TKI 治疗在真实世界中的结果的无偏参考,使用伊马替尼作为一线治疗,第二代 TKI 作为二线治疗。美国血液学杂志 92:82-87,2017。©2016 威利父子公司