Suppr超能文献

通过阿片类药物使用与犯罪的途径:一项系统综述。

Pathways through opiate use and offending: A systematic review.

作者信息

Hayhurst Karen P, Pierce Matthias, Hickman Matthew, Seddon Toby, Dunn Graham, Keane John, Millar Tim

机构信息

Centre for Mental Health and Safety, Institute of Brain, Behaviour and Mental Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.

Centre for Mental Health and Safety, Institute of Brain, Behaviour and Mental Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.

出版信息

Int J Drug Policy. 2017 Jan;39:1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.08.015. Epub 2016 Oct 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although evidence points to a strong link between illicit drug use and crime, robust evidence for temporal order in the relationship is scant. We carried out a systematic review to assess the evidence for pathways through opiate/crack cocaine use and offending to determine temporal order.

METHODS

A systematic review sourced five databases, three online sources, bibliographies and citation mapping. Inclusion criteria were: focus on opiate/crack use, and offending; pre-drug use information; longitudinal design; corroborative official crime records. Rate ratios (RR) of post-drug use initiation to pre-drug use initiation were pooled using random effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

20 studies were included; UK (9) and US (11). All were of opiate use. Mean age at (recorded) offending onset (16.7yrs) preceded mean age at opiate-use onset (19.6yrs). Substantial heterogeneity (over 80%: unexplained by meta-regression) meant that RRs were not pooled. The RR for total (recorded) offending ranged from 0.71 to 25.7 (10 studies; 22 subsamples: positive association, 4: equivocal, 1: negative association). Positive associations were observed in 14/15 independent samples; unlikely to be a chance finding (sign test p=0.001). Individual offence types were examined: theft (RR 0.63-8.3, 13 subsamples: positive, 9: equivocal, 1 negative); burglary (RR 0.74-50.0, 9 subsamples: positive, 13: equivocal); violence (RR 0.39-16.0, 6 subsamples: positive, 15: equivocal); and robbery (RR 0.50-5.0, 5 subsamples: positive, 15: equivocal).

CONCLUSIONS

Available evidence suggests that onset-opiate use accelerates already-existing offending, particularly for theft. However, evidence is out of date, with studies characterised by heterogeneity and failure to use a matched non-opiate-user comparison group to better-establish whether onset-opiate use is associated with additional crime.

摘要

背景

尽管有证据表明非法药物使用与犯罪之间存在紧密联系,但关于两者关系中时间顺序的有力证据却很少。我们进行了一项系统综述,以评估通过使用鸦片/快克可卡因及犯罪行为来确定时间顺序的相关证据。

方法

一项系统综述检索了五个数据库、三个在线资源、参考文献及引文图谱。纳入标准为:关注鸦片/快克使用及犯罪行为;使用药物前的信息;纵向设计;确凿的官方犯罪记录。使用随机效应荟萃分析汇总使用药物后开始与使用药物前开始的发生率比值(RR)。

结果

纳入20项研究,其中英国9项,美国11项。所有研究均涉及鸦片使用。(记录的)犯罪开始的平均年龄(16.7岁)早于鸦片使用开始的平均年龄(19.6岁)。大量异质性(超过80%:无法通过元回归解释)意味着无法汇总RR。总(记录的)犯罪的RR范围为0.71至25.7(10项研究;22个亚样本:正相关,4个:不确定,1个:负相关)。在14/15个独立样本中观察到正相关;不太可能是偶然发现(符号检验p = 0.001)。对个别犯罪类型进行了检查:盗窃(RR 0.63 - 8.3,13个亚样本:正相关,9个:不确定,1个负相关);入室盗窃(RR 0.74 - 50.0,9个亚样本:正相关,13个:不确定);暴力犯罪(RR 0.39 - 16.0,6个亚样本:正相关,15个:不确定);以及抢劫(RR 0.50 - 5.0,5个亚样本:正相关,15个:不确定)。

结论

现有证据表明,开始使用鸦片会加速已有的犯罪行为,尤其是盗窃犯罪。然而,证据已过时,研究存在异质性,且未使用匹配的非鸦片使用者对照组来更好地确定开始使用鸦片是否与额外犯罪有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e1f/5234472/28dfd8471018/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验