The Key Laboratory of Biomedical Information Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Life Science and Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, People's Republic of China.
Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710061, People's Republic of China.
Ultrason Sonochem. 2017 Jan;34:400-409. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.06.017. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
This paper compared the effects of flowing phase-shift nanodroplets (NDs) and lipid-shelled microbubbles (MBs) on subsequent cavitation during focused ultrasound (FUS) exposures. The cavitation activity was monitored using a passive cavitation detection method as solutions of either phase-shift NDs or lipid-shelled MBs flowed at varying velocities through a 5-mm diameter wall-less vessel in a transparent tissue-mimicking phantom when exposed to FUS. The intensity of cavitation for the phase-shift NDs showed an upward trend with time and cavitation for the lipid-shelled MBs grew to a maximum at the outset of the FUS exposure followed by a trend of decreases when they were static in the vessel. Meanwhile, the increase of cavitation for the phase-shift NDs and decrease of cavitation for the lipid-shelled MBs had slowed down when they flowed through the vessel. During two discrete identical FUS exposures, while the normalized inertial cavitation dose (ICD) value for the lipid-shelled MB solution was higher than that for the saline in the first exposure (p-value <0.05), it decreased to almost the same level in the second exposure. For the phase-shift NDs, the normalized ICD was 0.71 in the first exposure and increased to 0.97 in the second exposure. At a low acoustic power, the normalized ICD values for the lipid-shelled MBs tended to increase with increasing velocities from 5 to 30cm/s (r>0.95). Meanwhile, the normalized ICD value for the phase-shift NDs was 0.182 at a flow velocity of 5cm/s and increased to 0.188 at a flow velocity of 15cm/s. As the flow velocity increased to 20cm/s, the normalized ICD was 0.185 and decreased to 0.178 at a flow velocity of 30cm/s. At high acoustic power, the normalized ICD values for both the lipid-shelled MBs and the phase-shift NDs increased with increasing flow velocities from 5 to 30cm/s (r>0.95). The effects of the flowing phase-shift NDs vaporized into gas bubbles as cavitation nuclei on the subsequent cavitation were inverse to those of the flowing lipid-shelled MBs destroyed after focused ultrasound exposures.
本文比较了流动相移纳米液滴(NDs)和脂质壳微泡(MBs)对聚焦超声(FUS)暴露后随后空化的影响。将 FUS 暴露于无壁 5mm 直径容器中的流动相移 NDs 或脂质壳 MBs 溶液时,使用被动空化检测方法监测空化活性。相移 NDs 的空化强度随时间呈上升趋势,脂质壳 MBs 的空化在 FUS 暴露开始时达到最大值,然后在容器中静止时呈下降趋势。同时,当它们流过容器时,相移 NDs 的空化增加和脂质壳 MBs 的空化减少速度都减慢了。在两次离散的相同 FUS 暴露中,脂质壳 MB 溶液的归一化惯性空化剂量(ICD)值在第一次暴露中高于生理盐水(p 值<0.05),但在第二次暴露中几乎降至相同水平。对于相移 NDs,第一次暴露的归一化 ICD 为 0.71,第二次暴露增加到 0.97。在低声功率下,脂质壳 MBs 的归一化 ICD 值随速度从 5 到 30cm/s 的增加而趋于增加(r>0.95)。同时,相移 NDs 的归一化 ICD 值在流速为 5cm/s 时为 0.182,在流速为 15cm/s 时增加到 0.188。当流速增加到 20cm/s 时,归一化 ICD 为 0.185,在流速为 30cm/s 时降至 0.178。在高声功率下,脂质壳 MBs 和相移 NDs 的归一化 ICD 值随速度从 5 到 30cm/s 的增加而增加(r>0.95)。流动相移 NDs 汽化为气泡作为空化核对随后空化的影响与聚焦超声暴露后流动的脂质壳 MBs 破坏的影响相反。