Krishnan Anita, Pike Jodi I, McCarter Robert, Fulgium Amanda L, Wilson Emmanuel, Donofrio Mary T, Sable Craig A
Children's National Heart Institute, Children's National Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia.
Children's National Heart Institute, Children's National Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia.
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2016 Dec;29(12):1197-1206. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2016.08.019. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
Clinicians rely on age- and size-specific measures of cardiac structures to diagnose cardiac disease. No universally accepted normative data exist for fetal cardiac structures, and most fetal cardiac centers do not use the same standards. The aim of this study was to derive predictive models for Z scores for 13 commonly evaluated fetal cardiac structures using a large heterogeneous population of fetuses without structural cardiac defects.
The study used archived normal fetal echocardiograms in representative fetuses aged 12 to 39 weeks. Thirteen cardiac dimensions were remeasured by a blinded echocardiographer from digitally stored clips. Studies with inadequate imaging views were excluded. Regression models were developed to relate each dimension to estimated gestational age (EGA) by dates, biparietal diameter, femur length, and estimated fetal weight by the Hadlock formula. Dimension outcomes were transformed (e.g., using the logarithm or square root) as necessary to meet the normality assumption. Higher order terms, quadratic or cubic, were added as needed to improve model fit. Information criteria and adjusted R values were used to guide final model selection.
Each Z-score equation is based on measurements derived from 296 to 414 unique fetuses. EGA yielded the best predictive model for the majority of dimensions; adjusted R values ranged from 0.72 to 0.893. However, each of the other highly correlated (r > 0.94) biometric parameters was an acceptable surrogate for EGA. In most cases, the best fitting model included squared and cubic terms to introduce curvilinearity.
For each dimension, models based on EGA provided the best fit for determining normal measurements of fetal cardiac structures. Nevertheless, other biometric parameters, including femur length, biparietal diameter, and estimated fetal weight provided results that were nearly as good. Comprehensive Z-score results are available on the basis of highly predictive models derived from gestational age or other biometrics as preferable for clinical reasons. These results supplant current equations and will provide a foundation for future multicenter collaborations.
临床医生依靠针对心脏结构的年龄和大小特异性测量来诊断心脏病。目前尚无普遍接受的胎儿心脏结构标准数据,且大多数胎儿心脏中心使用的标准也不尽相同。本研究的目的是利用大量无心脏结构缺陷的异质胎儿群体,推导13种常用评估的胎儿心脏结构Z值的预测模型。
本研究使用了存档的12至39周代表性正常胎儿超声心动图。一名不知情的超声心动图医生从数字存储的片段中重新测量了13个心脏维度。排除成像视图不足的研究。建立回归模型,将每个维度与根据末次月经日期估算的孕周(EGA)、双顶径、股骨长度以及根据哈德洛克公式估算的胎儿体重相关联。必要时对维度结果进行转换(例如使用对数或平方根)以满足正态性假设。根据需要添加二次或三次高阶项以改善模型拟合度。使用信息标准和调整后的R值来指导最终模型选择。
每个Z值方程均基于来自296至414例独特胎儿的测量数据。对于大多数维度,EGA产生了最佳预测模型;调整后的R值范围为0.72至0.893。然而,其他高度相关(r>0.94)的生物测量参数中的每一个都是EGA的可接受替代指标。在大多数情况下,最佳拟合模型包括平方项和立方项以引入曲线关系。
对于每个维度,基于EGA的模型最适合用于确定胎儿心脏结构的正常测量值。尽管如此,其他生物测量参数,包括股骨长度、双顶径和估算的胎儿体重,提供的结果几乎同样良好。基于从孕周或其他生物特征得出的高度预测模型,可获得全面的Z值结果,出于临床原因,这些结果更可取。这些结果取代了当前的方程,并将为未来的多中心合作奠定基础。