Lee Soyoung, Kim Han Wool, Kim Kyung-Hyo
Center for Vaccine Evaluation and Study, Medical Research Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Pediatrics, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Transfusion. 2017 Jan;57(1):157-165. doi: 10.1111/trf.13869. Epub 2016 Oct 23.
Intravenous immunoglobulin G (IVIG) replacement therapy is used to prevent invasive infections in patients with primary antibody deficiency (PAD). However, few studies have functionally evaluated specific antibodies against encapsulated bacteria that cause invasive infection in patients with PAD. In this study, functional antibodies against Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib), Streptococcus pneumoniae (pneumococci), and Neisseria meningitidis (meningococci) in IVIG therapy were evaluated.
Sixteen lots of IVIG products prepared by two Korean manufacturers (Products A and B) were evaluated. The functional antibodies were measured by serum bactericidal assay for Hib and four meningococcal serogroups and by multiplexed opsonophagocytic assay for 26 pneumococcal serotypes. The estimated trough levels of antibodies against Hib, pneumococcus, and meningococcus were calculated to determine whether the usual IVIG dose is appropriate for protecting patients with PAD.
The functional antibody levels for Hib were similar in all of the IVIG products. In contrast, serum bacterial indices of meningococcal serogroups A and Y showed significant differences between products A and B. Opsonic indices to pneumococci varied depending on the serotype in each IVIG product. The estimated trough levels of antibodies against Hib, pneumococcus, and meningococcus exceeded the protective levels in most of the IVIG products except for the antibodies against two pneumococcal serotypes.
Most of the tested commercial IVIG products had sufficient functional antibodies against Hib, pneumococcus, and meningococcus to protect patients with PAD receiving IVIG treatment. Regular and continuous evaluation of IVIG products is necessary to maintain an optimal therapeutic effect.
静脉注射免疫球蛋白G(IVIG)替代疗法用于预防原发性抗体缺陷(PAD)患者发生侵袭性感染。然而,很少有研究对PAD患者体内针对引起侵袭性感染的包膜细菌的特异性抗体进行功能评估。在本研究中,对IVIG治疗中针对b型流感嗜血杆菌(Hib)、肺炎链球菌(肺炎球菌)和脑膜炎奈瑟菌(脑膜炎球菌)的功能性抗体进行了评估。
对两家韩国制造商生产的16批IVIG产品(产品A和产品B)进行了评估。通过针对Hib和四个脑膜炎球菌血清群的血清杀菌试验以及针对26种肺炎球菌血清型的多重调理吞噬试验来测量功能性抗体。计算针对Hib、肺炎球菌和脑膜炎球菌的抗体估计谷浓度,以确定常规IVIG剂量是否适合保护PAD患者。
所有IVIG产品中针对Hib的功能性抗体水平相似。相比之下,产品A和产品B之间,A群和Y群脑膜炎球菌的血清细菌指数存在显著差异。各IVIG产品中针对肺炎球菌的调理指数因血清型而异。除了针对两种肺炎球菌血清型的抗体外,大多数IVIG产品中针对Hib、肺炎球菌和脑膜炎球菌的抗体估计谷浓度超过了保护水平。
大多数测试的市售IVIG产品具有足够的针对Hib、肺炎球菌和脑膜炎球菌的功能性抗体,以保护接受IVIG治疗的PAD患者。为维持最佳治疗效果,有必要定期持续评估IVIG产品。