Immunovaccine Inc., 1344 Summer St., Halifax, NS B3H 0A8 Canada.
Sunnybrook Research Institute, 2075 Bayview Ave., Toronto, ON M4N 3M5 Canada ; University of Toronto, 27 King's College Cir, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1 Canada.
J Immunother Cancer. 2016 Oct 18;4:68. doi: 10.1186/s40425-016-0169-2. eCollection 2016.
BACKGROUND: Future cancer immunotherapies will combine multiple treatments to generate functional immune responses to cancer antigens through synergistic, multi-modal mechanisms. In this study we explored the combination of three distinct immunotherapies: a class I restricted peptide-based cancer vaccine, metronomic cyclophosphamide (mCPA) and anti-PD-1 treatment in a murine tumor model expressing HPV16 E7 (C3). METHODS: Mice were implanted with C3 tumors subcutaneously. Tumor bearing mice were treated with mCPA (20 mg/kg/day PO) for seven continuous days on alternating weeks, vaccinated with HPV16 E7 peptide antigen formulated in the DepoVax (DPX) adjuvanting platform every second week, and administered anti-PD-1 (200 μg/dose IP) after each vaccination. Efficacy was measured by following tumor growth and survival. Immunogenicity was measured by IFN-γ ELISpot of spleen, vaccine draining lymph nodes and tumor draining lymph nodes. Tumor infiltration was measured by flow cytometry for CD8α peptide-specific T cells and RT-qPCR for cytotoxic proteins. The clonality of tumor infiltrating T cells was measured by TCRβ sequencing using genomic DNA. RESULTS: Untreated C3 tumors had low expression of PD-L1 in vivo and anti-PD-1 therapy alone provided no protection from tumor growth. Treatment with DPX/mCPA could delay tumor growth, and tri-therapy with DPX/mCPA/anti-PD-1 provided long-term control of tumors. We found that treatment with DPX/mCPA/anti-PD-1 enhanced systemic antigen-specific immune responses detected in the spleen as determined by IFN-γ ELISpot compared to those in the DPX/mCPA group, but immune responses in tumor-draining lymph nodes were not increased. Although no increases in antigen-specific CD8α TILs could be detected, there was a trend for increased expression of cytotoxic genes within the tumor microenvironment as well as an increase in clonality in mice treated with DPX/mCPA/anti-PD-1 compared to those with anti-PD-1 alone or DPX/mCPA. Using a library of antigen-specific CD8α T cell clones, we found that antigen-specific clones were more frequently expanded in the DPX/mCPA/anti-PD-1 treated group. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate how the efficacy of anti-PD-1 may be improved by combination with a potent and targeted T cell activating immune therapy.
背景:未来的癌症免疫疗法将结合多种治疗方法,通过协同的多模式机制,产生针对癌症抗原的功能性免疫反应。在这项研究中,我们探索了三种不同免疫疗法的联合应用:一种基于 I 类限制肽的癌症疫苗、节拍式环磷酰胺(mCPA)和抗 PD-1 治疗,在表达 HPV16 E7(C3)的鼠肿瘤模型中。
方法:将 C3 肿瘤皮下植入小鼠。荷瘤小鼠连续 7 天每天口服 mCPA(20mg/kg),交替周进行,每两周用 DPX 佐剂平台配制的 HPV16 E7 肽抗原接种疫苗,每次接种后给予抗 PD-1(200μg/剂量 IP)。通过监测肿瘤生长和存活来衡量疗效。通过 IFN-γ ELISpot 检测脾、疫苗引流淋巴结和肿瘤引流淋巴结的免疫原性。通过流式细胞术检测 CD8α 肽特异性 T 细胞和 RT-qPCR 检测细胞毒性蛋白来测量肿瘤浸润。使用基因组 DNA 通过 TCRβ 测序测量肿瘤浸润 T 细胞的克隆性。
结果:未经处理的 C3 肿瘤在体内低表达 PD-L1,单独使用抗 PD-1 治疗不能防止肿瘤生长。DPX/mCPA 治疗可延迟肿瘤生长,而 DPX/mCPA/抗 PD-1 三联疗法可长期控制肿瘤。我们发现,与 DPX/mCPA 组相比,DPX/mCPA/抗 PD-1 治疗可增强系统中的抗原特异性免疫反应,这是通过 IFN-γ ELISpot 检测到的,但肿瘤引流淋巴结中的免疫反应没有增加。尽管无法检测到抗原特异性 CD8α TIL 的增加,但在 DPX/mCPA/抗 PD-1 治疗的小鼠中,肿瘤微环境中的细胞毒性基因表达增加,并且与单独使用抗 PD-1 或 DPX/mCPA 相比,克隆性增加。使用抗原特异性 CD8α T 细胞克隆文库,我们发现 DPX/mCPA/抗 PD-1 治疗组中抗原特异性克隆的扩增更为频繁。
结论:这些结果表明,通过与有效的、靶向 T 细胞激活免疫疗法联合使用,抗 PD-1 的疗效可以得到提高。
Cancer Immunol Res. 2019-7-22
Int Immunopharmacol. 2020-1-31
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012-4-2
BMC Cancer. 2020-1-8
Biomolecules. 2023-5-12
Int J Nanomedicine. 2022
J Nanobiotechnology. 2021-12-20
NAR Cancer. 2020-2-17
Vaccine. 2015-12-16
N Engl J Med. 2015-10-22
Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2015-8