Suppr超能文献

乐卡地平/依那普利与氨氯地平/依那普利及氢氯噻嗪/依那普利对非肥胖原发性高血压患者靶器官损害和交感神经激活的不同影响

Differential effects of lercanidipine/enalapril versus amlodipine/enalapril and hydrochlorothiazide/enalapril on target organ damage and sympathetic activation in non-obese essential hypertensive subjects.

作者信息

Tsioufis K, Tsioufis Costas, Dimitriadis Kyriakos, Mantzouranis Emmanouil, Mani Ilianna, Tousoulis Dimitrios

机构信息

a University of Athens, Hippokration Hospital , Athens , Greece.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2016 Oct;32(sup2):35-41. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1218839.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of the combination of lercanidipine/enalapril versus amlodipine/enalapril and hydrochlorothiazide/enalapril on blood pressure, target organ damage and sympathetic activation in patients with grade 2 essential hypertension.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a 3 month, randomized, blinded-endpoint study in essential hypertensive patients.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Office and ambulatory blood pressure, arterial stiffness, urinary albumin to creatinine ratio, renal arterial resistive index, and muscle sympathetic nerve activity were evaluated at baseline, after a 2 week run-in placebo period, at 1 month and at 3 months.

RESULTS

In total, 56 patients were assigned to lercanidipine/enalapril (n = 19), enalapril/amlodipine (n = 18) and hydrochlorothiazide/enalapril (n = 19). Each pharmacological combination tested was effective in reducing office blood pressure at 1 month and 3 months, and 24 h ambulatory blood pressure at 3 months. Renal arterial resistive index (RI) significantly improved at 1 month and 3 months compared with baseline in all groups. However in the lercanidipine/enalapril and hydrochlorothiazide/enalapril groups, RI was favorably reduced (0.53 ± 0.03 and 0.54 ± 0.04 respectively, p < 0.05) in comparison with the enalapril/amlodipine RI value (0.57 ± 0.03) at 3 months. Moreover, after 3 months of treatment, a significant decrease (by -5.47 bursts/min) (p < 0.05) in muscle sympathetic nerve activity was observed in the lercanidipine/enalapril group (50.79 ± 6.49) compared with baseline (56.26 ± 6.05), while no differences were detected in the amlodipine/enalapril and hydrochlorothiazide/enalapril groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides evidence of the efficacy of the lercanidipine/enalapril combination in ameliorating hypertension-related target organ damage and in reducing sympathetic overdrive.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较乐卡地平/依那普利联合用药与氨氯地平/依那普利及氢氯噻嗪/依那普利对2级原发性高血压患者血压、靶器官损害和交感神经激活的影响。

研究设计与方法

这是一项针对原发性高血压患者的为期3个月的随机、双盲终点研究。

主要观察指标

在基线、2周导入期安慰剂治疗后、1个月和3个月时评估诊室血压和动态血压、动脉僵硬度、尿白蛋白肌酐比值、肾动脉阻力指数和肌肉交感神经活动。

结果

总共56例患者被分配至乐卡地平/依那普利组(n = 19)、依那普利/氨氯地平组(n = 18)和氢氯噻嗪/依那普利组(n = 19)。所测试的每种药物组合在1个月和3个月时均能有效降低诊室血压,在3个月时能有效降低24小时动态血压。与基线相比,所有组的肾动脉阻力指数(RI)在1个月和3个月时均有显著改善。然而,在3个月时,乐卡地平/依那普利组和氢氯噻嗪/依那普利组的RI较依那普利/氨氯地平组(0.57±0.03)有更明显降低(分别为0.53±0.03和0.54±0.04,p < 0.05)。此外,治疗3个月后,乐卡地平/依那普利组(50.79±6.49)的肌肉交感神经活动较基线(56.26±6.05)显著降低(降低-5.47次/分钟)(p < 0.05),而氨氯地平/依那普利组和氢氯噻嗪/依那普利组未检测到差异。

结论

我们的研究提供了证据,证明乐卡地平/依那普利联合用药在改善高血压相关靶器官损害和降低交感神经亢进方面具有疗效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验