Ilett E, Kottke T, Thompson J, Rajani K, Zaidi S, Evgin L, Coffey M, Ralph C, Diaz R, Pandha H, Harrington K, Selby P, Bram R, Melcher A, Vile R
Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James' University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Gene Ther. 2017 Jan;24(1):21-30. doi: 10.1038/gt.2016.70. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
The anti-tumour effects associated with oncolytic virus therapy are mediated significantly through immune-mediated mechanisms, which depend both on the type of virus and the route of delivery. Here, we show that intra-tumoral oncolysis by Reovirus induced the priming of a CD8+, Th1-type anti-tumour response. By contrast, systemically delivered Vesicular Stomatitis Virus expressing a cDNA library of melanoma antigens (VSV-ASMEL) promoted a potent anti-tumour CD4+ Th17 response. Therefore, we hypothesised that combining the Reovirus-induced CD8+ T cell response, with the VSV-ASMEL CD4+ Th17 helper response, would produce enhanced anti-tumour activity. Consistent with this, priming with intra-tumoral Reovirus, followed by an intra-venous VSV-ASMEL Th17 boost, significantly improved survival of mice bearing established subcutaneous B16 melanoma tumours. We also show that combination of either therapy alone with anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint blockade augmented both the Th1 response induced by systemically delivered Reovirus in combination with GM-CSF, and also the Th17 response induced by VSV-ASMEL. Significantly, anti-PD-1 also uncovered an anti-tumour Th1 response following VSV-ASMEL treatment that was not seen in the absence of checkpoint blockade. Finally, the combination of all three treatments (priming with systemically delivered Reovirus, followed by double boosting with systemic VSV-ASMEL and anti-PD-1) significantly enhanced survival, with long-term cures, compared to any individual, or double, combination therapies, associated with strong Th1 and Th17 responses to tumour antigens. Our data show that it is possible to generate fully systemic, highly effective anti-tumour immunovirotherapy by combining oncolytic viruses, along with immune checkpoint blockade, to induce complementary mechanisms of anti-tumour immune responses.
溶瘤病毒疗法的抗肿瘤效应主要通过免疫介导机制实现,这既取决于病毒类型,也取决于给药途径。在此,我们表明呼肠孤病毒介导的肿瘤内溶瘤作用可引发CD8⁺、Th1型抗肿瘤反应。相比之下,系统性递送表达黑色素瘤抗原cDNA文库的水疱性口炎病毒(VSV-ASMEL)可促进强效的抗肿瘤CD4⁺ Th17反应。因此,我们推测将呼肠孤病毒诱导的CD8⁺ T细胞反应与VSV-ASMEL诱导的CD4⁺ Th17辅助反应相结合,会产生增强的抗肿瘤活性。与此一致的是,先用肿瘤内呼肠孤病毒进行致敏,随后静脉注射VSV-ASMEL增强Th17反应,可显著提高患有已建立的皮下B16黑色素瘤肿瘤小鼠的存活率。我们还表明,单独使用这两种疗法中的任何一种与抗PD-1免疫检查点阻断剂联合使用,均可增强系统性递送的呼肠孤病毒与GM-CSF联合诱导的Th1反应,以及VSV-ASMEL诱导的Th17反应。重要的是,抗PD-1还揭示了VSV-ASMEL治疗后出现的抗肿瘤Th1反应,而在没有检查点阻断的情况下未观察到这种反应。最后,与任何单一或双重联合疗法相比,所有三种治疗方法(先用系统性递送的呼肠孤病毒进行致敏,随后用系统性VSV-ASMEL和抗PD-1进行双重增强)的联合使用显著提高了存活率,并实现了长期治愈,同时伴有对肿瘤抗原的强烈Th1和Th17反应。我们的数据表明,通过将溶瘤病毒与免疫检查点阻断相结合,诱导抗肿瘤免疫反应的互补机制,有可能产生完全全身性、高效的抗肿瘤免疫病毒疗法。