• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创视频辅助甲状腺切除术:学术中心近十年的经验

Minimally Invasive Video-Assisted Thyroidectomy: Almost a Decade of Experience at an Academic Center.

作者信息

Frank Ethan, Park Joshua, Simental Alfred, Vuong Christopher, Liu Yuan, Kwon Daniel, Lin Yi, Filho Pedro Andrade

机构信息

Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, California, USA.

出版信息

Am Surg. 2016 Oct;82(10):949-952.

PMID:27779980
Abstract

Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) has gained acceptance as an alternative to conventional thyroidectomy. This technique results in less bleeding, postoperative pain, shorter recovery time, and better cosmetic results without increasing morbidity. We retrospectively assessed outcomes in 583 patients having MIVAT from May 2005 to September 2014. The study population was divided into groups according to periods: 2005 to 2009 and 2010 to 2014. Operative data, complications, and length of stay were collected and compared. Total thyroidectomy was undertaken in 185, completion thyroidectomy in 49, and hemithyroidectomy in 349. Malignancy was present in 127 (21.8%). Mean incision was 3.4 ± 0.7 cm and estimated blood loss was 23.7 ± 21.7 mL. Mean operative time was 86.5 ± 39.3 minutes for all operations, 78.5 ± 37.0 minutes for hemithyroidectomy, 70.9 ± 30.1 minutes for completion thyroidectomy, and 106.8 ± 41.3 minutes for total thyroidectomy. Postoperatively, 56 (9.6%) had unilateral vocal cord dysfunction, which resolved except for one case (0.17%). Fifty-nine patients (10.1%) developed hypocalcemia, but only three cases (0.51%) became permanent. Only one patient required readmission. In conclusion, MIVAT results in short operative times, minimal blood loss, and few complications and is safely performed in an academic institution.

摘要

微创视频辅助甲状腺切除术(MIVAT)已被认可为传统甲状腺切除术的替代方法。该技术出血少、术后疼痛轻、恢复时间短且美容效果更好,同时不增加发病率。我们回顾性评估了2005年5月至2014年9月期间接受MIVAT的583例患者的手术结果。研究人群按时间段分为两组:2005年至2009年组和2010年至2014年组。收集并比较了手术数据、并发症及住院时间。行全甲状腺切除术185例,甲状腺次全切除术49例,半甲状腺切除术349例。127例(21.8%)存在恶性病变。平均切口为3.4±0.7 cm,估计失血量为23.7±21.7 mL。所有手术的平均手术时间为86.5±39.3分钟,半甲状腺切除术为78.5±37.0分钟,甲状腺次全切除术为70.9±30.1分钟,全甲状腺切除术为106.8±41.3分钟。术后,56例(9.6%)出现单侧声带功能障碍,除1例(0.17%)外均已恢复。59例(10.1%)发生低钙血症,但仅3例(0.51%)为永久性。仅1例患者需要再次入院。总之,MIVAT手术时间短、失血少、并发症少,在学术机构中可安全进行。

相似文献

1
Minimally Invasive Video-Assisted Thyroidectomy: Almost a Decade of Experience at an Academic Center.微创视频辅助甲状腺切除术:学术中心近十年的经验
Am Surg. 2016 Oct;82(10):949-952.
2
Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy versus conventional thyroidectomy in pediatric patients.小儿患者的微创视频辅助甲状腺切除术与传统甲状腺切除术的比较
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2014 Oct;24(5):398-402. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1351391. Epub 2013 Sep 2.
3
Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy 2.0: expanded indications in a tertiary care cancer center.2.0 版微创视频辅助甲状腺切除术:在一家三级癌症治疗中心的扩展适应证。
Head Neck. 2011 Nov;33(11):1557-60. doi: 10.1002/hed.21633. Epub 2010 Dec 28.
4
Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy for follicular neoplasm: is there an advantage over conventional thyroidectomy?微创视频辅助甲状腺切除术治疗滤泡性肿瘤:与传统甲状腺切除术相比有优势吗?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2006 Feb;13(2):182-6. doi: 10.1245/ASO.2006.03.057. Epub 2006 Jan 17.
5
Comparison between transareola singlesite endoscopic thyroidectomy and minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy.乳晕单孔内镜甲状腺切除术与微创视频辅助甲状腺切除术的比较。
J Int Med Res. 2012;40(6):2213-9. doi: 10.1177/030006051204000619.
6
Comparison between minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy and conventional thyroidectomy: is there any evidence-based information?微创电视辅助甲状腺切除术与传统甲状腺切除术的比较:是否有循证医学信息?
Thyroid. 2008 Jul;18(7):721-7. doi: 10.1089/thy.2008.0028.
7
[Minimally Invasive Video-assisted Thyroidectomy. Experience the same working group].[微创视频辅助甲状腺切除术。同一工作组的经验]
Rev Fac Cien Med Univ Nac Cordoba. 2017 Sep 8;74(3):251-255. doi: 10.31053/1853.0605.v74.n3.15593.
8
Surgical treatment of low- and intermediate-risk papillary thyroid cancer with minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy.采用微创电视辅助甲状腺切除术治疗低危和中危乳头状甲状腺癌
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009 May;94(5):1618-22. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-1418. Epub 2009 Feb 17.
9
Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: a retrospective study over two years of experience.微创视频辅助甲状腺切除术:一项为期两年的经验回顾性研究。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009 Jul;141(1):29-33. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2009.01.015. Epub 2009 Mar 17.
10
Minimally invasive video assisted thyroidectomy versus endoscopic thyroidectomy via the areola approach: a retrospective analysis of safety, postoperative recovery, and patient satisfaction.微创视频辅助甲状腺切除术与乳晕入路内镜甲状腺切除术的比较:安全性、术后恢复及患者满意度的回顾性分析
Minerva Chir. 2012 Feb;67(1):31-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Thyroid Surgery - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.微创甲状腺手术的结果 - 系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Aug 12;12:719397. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.719397. eCollection 2021.
2
Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy and transoral video-assisted thyroidectomy: A comparison of two systematic reviews.微创视频辅助甲状腺切除术与经口视频辅助甲状腺切除术:两项系统评价的比较
J Minim Access Surg. 2020 Oct-Dec;16(4):315-322. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_123_19.
3
Video-assisted neck surgery (VANS) using a gasless lifting procedure for thyroid and parathyroid diseases: "The VANS method from A to Z".
视频辅助颈部手术(VANS)在甲状腺和甲状旁腺疾病中的应用:“从 A 到 Z 的 VANS 方法”。
Surg Today. 2020 Oct;50(10):1126-1137. doi: 10.1007/s00595-019-01908-4. Epub 2019 Nov 14.