Turnbull Nathan J, Berend Keith R, Ng Vincent Y, Adams Joanne B, Crawford David A, Lombardi Adolph V
Florida Orthopaedic Associates, DeLand, Florida.
Joint Implant Surgeons, Inc., New Albany, Ohio, White Fence Surgical Suites New Albany, Ohio, Mount Carmel Health System, Columbus, Ohio.
Surg Technol Int. 2016 Oct 26;29:279-286.
The gender-specific total knee arthroplasty (TKA) debate focuses on differences in distal femoral mediolateral to anteroposterior aspect ratio between males and females. However, randomized studies have been unable to demonstrate significant differences in outcomes utilizing gender-specific implants. No studies have examined the effect of intermediate femoral component sizes on outcome. We compared outcomes before and after intermediate sizing availability.
We identified 331 patients (413 knees) who underwent primary TKA between 2003 and 2004 with a single complete knee system. There were 121 males and 210 females. Three intermediate femoral sizes were added in March 2004 to the six initial options. Patients before March 2004 were assigned to group 1 (n=178), and after to group 2 (n=235).
Follow-up averaged 8.5 years. Preoperative demographics and clinical scores were similar between groups. Knee Society (KS) clinical and functional scores improved in females in both groups, but there was no significant difference. Male patients in group 2 had a significant improvement in KS clinical scores compared to male patients in group 1 (group 1: 33.9, group 2: 41.1; p=0.01). Females in group 2 had significantly less need for manipulation, 1.9%, versus females in group 1, 8.7% (p=0.01). MUA rates were similar for men between groups. Overall, there were 19 revisions (4.6%) with no differences between groups or by genders. Once intermediate sizes were available, they were used in 48% of females and 13% of males. The average femoral component size for females in group 1 was 65 mm and decreased in group 2 to 62.5 mm. The average size of femoral components in males was 70 mm in both groups.
Availability of intermediate size femoral component sizes was associated with a lower rate of manipulation in female patients. Greater KS clinical score improvement was observed in men after availability of additional femoral sizes.
全膝关节置换术(TKA)中关于性别的争论主要集中在男性和女性股骨远端内外侧与前后径比值的差异上。然而,随机研究未能证明使用针对性别的植入物在疗效上存在显著差异。尚无研究探讨股骨假体中间尺寸对疗效的影响。我们比较了中间尺寸假体可用前后的疗效。
我们确定了2003年至2004年间使用单一完整膝关节系统接受初次TKA的331例患者(413膝)。其中男性121例,女性210例。2004年3月,在最初的六个选项基础上增加了三种中间股骨尺寸。2004年3月之前的患者被分配到第1组(n = 178),之后的患者被分配到第2组(n = 235)。
平均随访8.5年。两组术前人口统计学和临床评分相似。两组女性的膝关节协会(KS)临床和功能评分均有改善,但无显著差异。与第1组男性患者相比,第2组男性患者的KS临床评分有显著改善(第1组:33.9,第2组:41.1;p = 0.01)。第2组女性需要手法治疗的比例显著低于第1组女性,分别为1.9%和8.7%(p = 0.01)。两组男性的手法治疗率相似。总体而言,共有19例翻修(4.6%),两组之间以及不同性别之间无差异。中间尺寸假体可用后,48%的女性和13%的男性使用了该尺寸假体。第1组女性的平均股骨假体尺寸为65mm,第2组降至62.5mm。两组男性股骨假体的平均尺寸均为70mm。
股骨假体中间尺寸的可用性与女性患者较低的手法治疗率相关。额外股骨尺寸可用后,男性患者的KS临床评分改善更大。