Otte Ina C, Jung Corinna, Elger Bernice, Bally Klaus
Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Bernoullistr. 28, 4056, Basel, Switzerland.
Institute of Primary Health Care, University of Basel, Klingelbergstr. 61, 4056, Basel, Switzerland.
Med Health Care Philos. 2017 Jun;20(2):249-256. doi: 10.1007/s11019-016-9744-z.
GPs usually care for their patients for an extended period of time, therefore, requests to not only discontinue a patient's treatment but to assist a patient in a suicide are likely to create intensely stressful situations for physicians. However, in order to ensure the best patient care possible, the competent communication about the option of physician assisted suicide (PAS) as well as the assessment of the origin and sincerity of the request are very important. This is especially true, since patients' requests for PAS can also be an indicator for unmet needs or concerns. Twenty-three qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted to in-depth explore this multifaceted, complex topic while enabling GPs to express possible difficulties when being asked for assistance. The analysis of the gathered data shows three main themes why GPs may find it difficult to professionally communicate about PAS: concerns for their own psychological well-being, conflicting personal values or their understanding of their professional role. In the discussion part of this paper we re-assess these different themes in order to ethically discuss and analyse how potential barriers to professional communication concerning PAS could be overcome.
全科医生通常会在较长时间内照顾他们的患者,因此,不仅要求停止对患者的治疗,还要求协助患者自杀,这可能会给医生带来极大的压力。然而,为了确保尽可能提供最佳的患者护理,就医生协助自杀(PAS)选项进行有效的沟通以及评估请求的来源和诚意非常重要。这一点尤其正确,因为患者对PAS的请求也可能是未满足的需求或担忧的一个指标。进行了23次定性半结构化访谈,以深入探讨这个多方面、复杂的话题,同时让全科医生能够表达在被请求协助时可能遇到的困难。对收集到的数据进行分析后,得出了全科医生在专业沟通PAS方面可能感到困难的三个主要主题:对自身心理健康的担忧、相互冲突的个人价值观或对其职业角色的理解。在本文的讨论部分,我们重新评估这些不同的主题,以便从伦理角度讨论和分析如何克服与PAS专业沟通的潜在障碍。