Norton N C
J Pers Assess. 1989 Fall;53(3):621-37. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5303_18.
The psychometric properties of three scales of alexithymia were examined in a sample of 187 female undergraduates. The Shalling Sifneos Personality Scale (SSPS) and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) Alexithymia scale had little internal consistency. The scored archetypal test with nine elements (SAT9) had very low interrater reliability. As predicted, the tree measures were not significantly related to one another and the SSPS had a more clearly defined factor structure than the MMPI scale. The MMPI and SSPS scales were differentially related to measures of symptomatology but were similarly related to extraversion, absorption, and SAT scores. Of the three scales, the SSPS appeared to have the highest content validity. The results suggest that alexithymia is not a unitary construct and that its reification as such may be premature.
在187名女大学生样本中,对三种述情障碍量表的心理测量特性进行了检验。沙林-西夫neos人格量表(SSPS)和明尼苏达多相人格调查表(MMPI)述情障碍量表的内部一致性较低。包含九个元素的计分原型测试(SAT9)的评分者间信度非常低。正如预期的那样,这三种测量方法彼此之间没有显著相关性,并且SSPS比MMPI量表具有更明确的因素结构。MMPI和SSPS量表与症状学测量的相关性不同,但与外向性、专注度和SAT分数的相关性相似。在这三种量表中,SSPS似乎具有最高的内容效度。结果表明,述情障碍不是一个单一的结构,将其具体化可能为时过早。