Suppr超能文献

述情障碍:三种自我报告测量方法的比较研究

Alexithymia: a comparative study of three self-report measures.

作者信息

Bagby R M, Taylor G J, Atkinson L

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Clarke Institute of Psychiatry, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Psychosom Res. 1988;32(1):107-16. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(88)90094-3.

Abstract

This study evaluates and compares the psychometric properties of the three self-report measures of alexithymia - a hypothetical personality construct thought to be associated with hypochondriasis, somatization disorder and a variety of other medical and psychiatric disorders. Two hundred and nine college students were administered the Schalling-Sifneos Personality Scale (SSPS), MMPI alexithymia scale (MMPI-A), Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS), and two measures of functional somatic symptoms. Results indicated that the TAS is internally consistent and sensitive to reports of somatic symptoms. In contrast, the SSPS and MMPI-A were found to have response and/or gender biases, poor internal reliabilities, and no systematic relationship with somatic symptoms. In addition, factor analysis showed the TAS to have a stable, replicable factor structure, while the SSPS demonstrated little factor stability. These findings suggest that the TAS is the most psychometrically sound measure of the alexithymia construct.

摘要

本研究评估并比较了三种述情障碍自评量表的心理测量特性——述情障碍是一种假设的人格结构,被认为与疑病症、躯体化障碍以及多种其他医学和精神疾病有关。对209名大学生施测了沙林-西夫neos人格量表(SSPS)、明尼苏达多相人格调查表述情障碍量表(MMPI-A)、多伦多述情障碍量表(TAS),以及两种功能性躯体症状测量工具。结果表明,TAS具有内部一致性,且对躯体症状报告敏感。相比之下,发现SSPS和MMPI-A存在反应和/或性别偏差、内部信度较差,且与躯体症状无系统关系。此外,因子分析表明TAS具有稳定、可重复的因子结构,而SSPS几乎没有因子稳定性。这些发现表明,TAS是述情障碍结构在心理测量方面最可靠的测量工具。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验