Suppr超能文献

述情障碍:三种自我报告测量方法的比较研究

Alexithymia: a comparative study of three self-report measures.

作者信息

Bagby R M, Taylor G J, Atkinson L

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Clarke Institute of Psychiatry, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Psychosom Res. 1988;32(1):107-16. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(88)90094-3.

Abstract

This study evaluates and compares the psychometric properties of the three self-report measures of alexithymia - a hypothetical personality construct thought to be associated with hypochondriasis, somatization disorder and a variety of other medical and psychiatric disorders. Two hundred and nine college students were administered the Schalling-Sifneos Personality Scale (SSPS), MMPI alexithymia scale (MMPI-A), Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS), and two measures of functional somatic symptoms. Results indicated that the TAS is internally consistent and sensitive to reports of somatic symptoms. In contrast, the SSPS and MMPI-A were found to have response and/or gender biases, poor internal reliabilities, and no systematic relationship with somatic symptoms. In addition, factor analysis showed the TAS to have a stable, replicable factor structure, while the SSPS demonstrated little factor stability. These findings suggest that the TAS is the most psychometrically sound measure of the alexithymia construct.

摘要

本研究评估并比较了三种述情障碍自评量表的心理测量特性——述情障碍是一种假设的人格结构,被认为与疑病症、躯体化障碍以及多种其他医学和精神疾病有关。对209名大学生施测了沙林-西夫neos人格量表(SSPS)、明尼苏达多相人格调查表述情障碍量表(MMPI-A)、多伦多述情障碍量表(TAS),以及两种功能性躯体症状测量工具。结果表明,TAS具有内部一致性,且对躯体症状报告敏感。相比之下,发现SSPS和MMPI-A存在反应和/或性别偏差、内部信度较差,且与躯体症状无系统关系。此外,因子分析表明TAS具有稳定、可重复的因子结构,而SSPS几乎没有因子稳定性。这些发现表明,TAS是述情障碍结构在心理测量方面最可靠的测量工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验