Dalic Linda, Cook Mark J
Department of Neurology, Austin Health.
St Vincent's Hospital, Centre for Clinical Neurosciences and Neurological Research; Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2016 Oct 12;12:2605-2616. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S84852. eCollection 2016.
Despite the development of new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), ~20%-30% of people with epilepsy remain refractory to treatment and are said to have drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). This multifaceted condition comprises intractable seizures, neurobiochemical changes, cognitive decline, and psychosocial dysfunction. An ongoing challenge to both researchers and clinicians alike, DRE management is complicated by the heterogeneity among this patient group. The underlying mechanism of DRE is not completely understood. Many hypotheses exist, and relate to both the intrinsic characteristics of the particular epilepsy (associated syndrome/lesion, initial response to AED, and the number and type of seizures prior to diagnosis) and other pharmacological mechanisms of resistance. The four current hypotheses behind pharmacological resistance are the "transporter", "target", "network", and "intrinsic severity" hypotheses, and these are reviewed in this paper. Of equal challenge is managing patients with DRE, and this requires a multidisciplinary approach, involving physicians, surgeons, psychiatrists, neuropsychologists, pharmacists, dietitians, and specialist nurses. Attention to comorbid psychiatric and other diseases is paramount, given the higher prevalence in this cohort and associated poorer health outcomes. Treatment options need to consider the economic burden to the patient and the likelihood of AED compliance and tolerability. Most importantly, higher mortality rates, due to comorbidities, suicide, and sudden death, emphasize the importance of seizure control in reducing this risk. Overall, resective surgery offers the best rates of seizure control. It is not an option for all patients, and there is often a significant delay in referring to epilepsy surgery centers. Optimization of AEDs, identification and treatment of comorbidities, patient education to promote adherence to treatment, and avoidance of triggers should be periodically performed until further insights regarding causative pathology can guide better therapies.
尽管新型抗癫痫药物(AEDs)不断发展,但仍有20%-30%的癫痫患者对治疗无效,被认为患有药物难治性癫痫(DRE)。这种多方面的病症包括难治性癫痫发作、神经生化变化、认知衰退和心理社会功能障碍。DRE的管理对研究人员和临床医生来说都是一个持续的挑战,该患者群体的异质性使这一管理变得复杂。DRE的潜在机制尚未完全明确。存在许多假说,这些假说既与特定癫痫的内在特征(相关综合征/病变、对AED的初始反应以及诊断前癫痫发作的次数和类型)有关,也与其他耐药的药理学机制有关。目前关于药理学耐药的四个假说是“转运体”“靶点”“网络”和“内在严重程度”假说,本文将对这些假说进行综述。管理DRE患者同样具有挑战性,这需要多学科方法,涉及内科医生、外科医生、精神科医生、神经心理学家、药剂师、营养师和专科护士。鉴于该队列中合并精神疾病和其他疾病的患病率较高且相关健康结果较差,关注这些合并症至关重要。治疗方案需要考虑患者的经济负担以及AED依从性和耐受性的可能性。最重要的是,由于合并症、自杀和猝死导致的较高死亡率强调了控制癫痫发作以降低这种风险的重要性。总体而言,切除性手术提供了最佳的癫痫发作控制率。但并非所有患者都适用,而且转诊至癫痫手术中心往往会有显著延迟。应定期优化AEDs、识别和治疗合并症、对患者进行教育以促进治疗依从性以及避免触发因素,直到对致病病理有进一步了解以指导更好的治疗。