Muthusamy Dheepa, Sudhishnaa S, Boppe Appalaraju
Associate Professor, Department of Microbiology, Government Medical College & ESIC Hospital , Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India .
Student, PSG Institute of Medical Sciences & Research , Peelamedu, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India .
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Sep;10(9):DC15-DC18. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/19968.8535. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
() is rapidly emerging as a potent organism causing a multitude of nosocomial infections. The organism also carries various resistance mechanisms to antibiotics, making treatment more difficult. Very few choices are left, as strains have begun to develop resistance against cephalosporins, aminoglycosides and even carbapenems.
To examine the sensitivity pattern of three older antibiotics namely colistin, polymyxin B and rifampicin against carbapenem resistant by disk diffusion method and the sensitivity of colistin alone by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) determination by VITEK automated system.
Hundred clinical isolates of carbapenem resistant were tested for sensitivity to colistin, polymyxin B and rifampicin by Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method. They were also tested for sensitivity to colistin by VITEK 2C (biomérieux) automated microbial identification system. The zone diameters and Minimum Inhibitory Concentration values for the above two methods, respectively were observed and analysed. All the Antibiotic Susceptibility Tests were done according to the CLSI guidelines.
By Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method, 78% of the carbapenem resistant strains were found to be sensitive, 12% intermediate sensitive and 10% resistant to colistin. All the isolates were sensitive to polymyxin B and 80% were resistant to rifampicin. By the VITEK automated system, 99% of the isolates were sensitive to colistin (more in number than by disk diffusion method).
Polymyxins (colistin - polymyxin E and polymyxin B) are the next choice for multidrug resistant serious nosocomial infections like those of , till newer antibiotics are discovered to treat such infections. Rifampicin resistance was found to be very high and hence, is not advised for monotherapy.
(某病原体名称)正迅速成为引发多种医院感染的强效病原体。该病原体还具有多种抗生素耐药机制,使得治疗更加困难。由于(某病原体名称)菌株已开始对头孢菌素、氨基糖苷类抗生素甚至碳青霉烯类抗生素产生耐药性,可供选择的治疗药物已寥寥无几。
通过纸片扩散法检测三种较老的抗生素即黏菌素、多黏菌素B和利福平对耐碳青霉烯类(某病原体名称)的敏感性模式,并通过VITEK自动化系统采用最低抑菌浓度(MIC)测定法单独检测黏菌素的敏感性。
采用 Kirby - Bauer纸片扩散法对100株耐碳青霉烯类(某病原体名称)临床分离株进行黏菌素、多黏菌素B和利福平的敏感性检测。还通过VITEK 2C(生物梅里埃公司)自动化微生物鉴定系统对它们进行黏菌素敏感性检测。分别观察并分析上述两种方法的抑菌圈直径和最低抑菌浓度值。所有抗生素敏感性试验均按照CLSI指南进行。
通过Kirby - Bauer纸片扩散法,发现78%的耐碳青霉烯类菌株对黏菌素敏感,12%为中度敏感,10%耐药。所有分离株对多黏菌素B敏感,80%对利福平耐药。通过VITEK自动化系统,99%的分离株对黏菌素敏感(数量比纸片扩散法更多)。
在发现新的抗生素用于治疗此类感染之前,多黏菌素(黏菌素 - 多黏菌素E和多黏菌素B)是治疗多重耐药严重医院感染(如由某病原体名称引起的感染)的次选药物。发现利福平耐药性非常高,因此不建议单药治疗。