Evans David, Owen Stephanie, Green John
School of Medicine, Cardiff University, UK.
Clin Teach. 2017 Aug;14(4):284-288. doi: 10.1111/tct.12570. Epub 2016 Oct 28.
Medical students form an important part of the medical team; however, patients may not be fully aware of their role. Identifying students in the clinical setting is difficult because of their similar attire to other health care professionals. This parity may introduce unethical scenarios where patients may be speaking and consenting to individuals whom they do not recognise as students.
A single-sided questionnaire was given to hospital in-patients during a 12-week period. Questions focused on the role of students. With their opinions, patients were given a list of clinical skills and asked whether or not they would allow a student to carry out these skills on themselves. The list included both required and non-required clinical skills by the General Medical Council (GMC).
In total, 101 patients participated in the study: 34 males and 67 females. Age at admittance was 63.4 ± 18.0 years; 74.3 per cent of patients were able to identify a student, although 87.1 per cent believed that students should have a designated uniform. Patients were significantly more likely to allow a student to perform required skills on them, as opposed to non-required skills (p < 0.0001); however, previous contact with a medical student made no difference in the likelihood of consenting to a skill being performed. Identifying students in the clinical setting is difficult CONCLUSIONS: The apparent trade-off between patient safety and providing students with learning opportunities has been of long standing concern. Patients consider GMC-required skills as largely appropriate; however, patients feel that students should be more identifiable, and increasing the awareness of the role and capabilities of a student in patient care is important.
医学生是医疗团队的重要组成部分;然而,患者可能并不完全了解他们的角色。由于医学生与其他医护人员着装相似,在临床环境中识别他们很困难。这种同等性可能会引发不道德的情况,即患者可能会与他们未认出是学生的人交谈并给予同意。
在12周的时间里,向住院患者发放了一份单面问卷。问题集中在学生的角色上。根据他们的意见,向患者列出一系列临床技能,并询问他们是否允许学生对自己进行这些技能操作。该列表包括英国医学总会(GMC)规定的必需和非必需临床技能。
共有101名患者参与了研究,其中男性34名,女性67名。入院时的年龄为63.4±18.0岁;74.3%的患者能够认出学生,尽管87.1%的患者认为学生应该有指定的制服。与非必需技能相比,患者明显更有可能允许学生对他们进行必需技能的操作(p<0.0001);然而,之前与医学生的接触对同意进行某项技能操作的可能性没有影响。在临床环境中识别学生很困难。
患者安全与为学生提供学习机会之间明显的权衡一直是长期关注的问题。患者认为GMC规定的技能在很大程度上是合适的;然而,患者觉得学生应该更容易被识别,提高患者对学生在医疗护理中的角色和能力的认识很重要。