Suppr超能文献

感知还是现实:热感能否为高温环境下消防员的管理提供参考?

Perception or reality: Can thermal perceptions inform management of firefighters in the heat?

作者信息

Walker Anthony, Rattray Ben, Brearley Matt

机构信息

a University of Canberra Research Institute for Sport and Exercise, University of Canberra , Bruce , ACT , Australia.

b Discipline of Sport and Exercise Science, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra , Bruce , ACT , Australia.

出版信息

J Occup Environ Hyg. 2017 Apr;14(4):306-312. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2016.1240871.

Abstract

Accurately assessing the physiological status of firefighters during work in the heat is critical to ensuring their safety. Evaluating core temperatures (T) in the field is problematic due to cost and limitations in technology and accuracy. As such, fire services rely on individual perceptions of wellbeing. The present study aimed to establish whether perceptual responses measured using the perceptual strain index (PeSI), calculated from rate of perceived exertion (RPE) and thermal sensation (TS), could reliably predict the physiological strain (PSI) encountered by experienced firefighters working in a hot environment. We conducted two firefighting simulations (set-pace and self-paced) in a purposefully built heat chamber (100 ± 5°C) comprised of two 20-min periods separated by a 10-min recovery outside the chamber. Physiological strain was measured via heart rate (HR) and gastrointestinal temperature (T) and compared with PeSI at 5-min intervals. To evaluate the predictive ability of the PeSI for PSI, mean differences and the 95% limits of agreement (LOA) were established, along with correlation coefficients at each 5-min interval. Moderately significant correlations occurred in the second work bout of the self-paced trial only (10 min: r = 0.335, 15 min: r = 0.498, 20 min r = 0.439) with no other correlations observed at any other time during either trial or during the rest periods. Bland-Altman analysis revealed mean differences of -0.74 ± 2.70 (self-paced) and +0.04 ± 2.04 (set-paced) between PeSI and PSI with the 95% LOA being -4.77 to 3.28 (self-paced) and -4.01 to 2.01 (set-paced). The wide LOA and lack of correlations observed between perceptual and physiological strain in both self-paced and set-paced work trials indicate that PeSI is not sufficiently reliable as a sole measure of wellbeing for firefighters working in the heat. Hence, we recommend that fire services prioritise the development of reliable and effective monitoring tools for use in the field.

摘要

准确评估消防员在高温环境下工作时的生理状态对于确保他们的安全至关重要。由于成本以及技术和准确性方面的限制,在现场评估核心体温(T)存在问题。因此,消防部门依赖个人对自身健康状况的感知。本研究旨在确定使用感知应变指数(PeSI)测量的感知反应(由感知运动用力程度(RPE)和热感觉(TS)计算得出)是否能够可靠地预测在炎热环境中工作的经验丰富的消防员所遇到的生理应变(PSI)。我们在一个专门建造的热室(100±5°C)中进行了两次灭火模拟(设定节奏和自主节奏),模拟由两个20分钟的时间段组成,中间有10分钟在热室外的恢复时间。通过心率(HR)和胃肠道温度(T)测量生理应变,并每隔5分钟与PeSI进行比较。为了评估PeSI对PSI的预测能力,确定了平均差异和95%一致性界限(LOA),以及每个5分钟间隔的相关系数。仅在自主节奏试验的第二个工作时段出现了中度显著的相关性(10分钟:r = 0.335,15分钟:r = 0.498,20分钟:r = 0.439),在任何一次试验期间或休息期间的其他时间均未观察到其他相关性。Bland - Altman分析显示,PeSI与PSI之间的平均差异为-0.74±2.70(自主节奏)和+0.04±2.04(设定节奏),95% LOA为-4.77至3.28(自主节奏)和-4.01至2.01(设定节奏)。在自主节奏和设定节奏的工作试验中,感知应变与生理应变之间观察到的宽LOA和缺乏相关性表明,对于在高温环境中工作的消防员而言,PeSI作为健康状况的唯一衡量标准不够可靠。因此,我们建议消防部门优先开发适用于现场的可靠且有效的监测工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验