Sharma Aditya Narain, Barron Evelyn, Le Couteur James, Close Andrew, Rushton Steven, Grunze Heinz, Kelly Thomas, Nicol Ferrier Ian, Le Couteur Ann Simone
Newcastle University, UK; Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Newcastle University, UK.
J Affect Disord. 2017 Jan 15;208:198-204. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.10.006. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
Young people 'at risk' for developing Bipolar Disorder have been shown to have deficits in facial emotion labeling across emotions with some studies reporting deficits for one or more particular emotions. However, these have included a heterogeneous group of young people (siblings of adolescents and offspring of adults with bipolar disorder), who have themselves diagnosed psychopathology (mood disorders and neurodevelopmental disorders including ADHD).
24 offspring of adults with bipolar I disorder and 34 offspring of healthy controls were administered the Diagnostic Analysis of Non Verbal Accuracy 2 (DANVA 2) to investigate the ability of participants to correctly label 4 emotions: happy, sad, fear and anger using both child and adult faces as stimuli at low and high intensity.
Mixed effects modelling revealed that the offspring of adults with bipolar I disorder made more errors in both the overall recognition of facial emotions and the specific recognition of fear compared with the offspring of healthy controls. Further more errors were made by offspring that were male, younger in age and also in recognition of emotions using 'child' stimuli.
The sample size, lack of blinding of the study team and the absence of any stimuli that assess subjects' response to a neutral emotional stimulus are limitations of the study.
Offspring (with no history of current or past psychopathology or psychotropic medication) of adults with bipolar I disorder displayed facial emotion labeling deficits (particularly fear) suggesting facial emotion labeling may be an endophenotype for bipolar disorder.
有研究表明,有患双相情感障碍风险的年轻人在对面部表情进行情绪分类时存在缺陷,一些研究报告称在一种或多种特定情绪分类上存在缺陷。然而,这些研究纳入了一组异质性的年轻人(双相情感障碍青少年的兄弟姐妹以及双相情感障碍成年患者的后代),他们本身已被诊断患有精神病理学疾病(情绪障碍和神经发育障碍,包括注意力缺陷多动障碍)。
对24名双相I型障碍成年患者的后代和34名健康对照者的后代进行了非言语准确性诊断分析2(DANVA 2)测试,以调查参与者使用儿童和成人面孔作为低强度和高强度刺激来正确识别四种情绪(快乐、悲伤、恐惧和愤怒)的能力。
混合效应模型显示,与健康对照者的后代相比,双相I型障碍成年患者的后代在面部情绪的整体识别以及对恐惧的特定识别方面都犯了更多错误。此外,男性后代、年龄较小的后代以及在使用“儿童”刺激识别情绪时也犯了更多错误。
样本量、研究团队缺乏盲法以及缺乏评估受试者对中性情绪刺激反应的任何刺激是本研究的局限性。
双相I型障碍成年患者的后代(无当前或过去精神病理学疾病或精神药物治疗史)表现出面部情绪分类缺陷(尤其是恐惧),这表明面部情绪分类可能是双相情感障碍的一种内表型。