Parmar Rudrangi, Ghanta Ajay, Haware Rahul V, Johnson Paul R, Stagner William C
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Campbell University College of Pharmacy & Health Sciences, Buies Creek, North Carolina 27506; Patheon, Analytical Development, Greenville, North Carolina 27834.
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Campbell University College of Pharmacy & Health Sciences, Buies Creek, North Carolina 27506; Sancilio and Company, Formulation Development, Riviera Beach, Florida 33404.
J Pharm Sci. 2016 Dec;105(12):3603-3610. doi: 10.1016/j.xphs.2016.08.030. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
A sucrose octaacetate (SOA) gradient HPLC evaporative light scattering detection (ELSD) and low-wavelength UV-diode array detection (UV-DAD)-specific stability-indicating method development and validation comparison is reported. A central composite response surface design and multicriteria optimization was used to maximize molten SOA area-under-the-curve response and signal-to-noise ratio. The ELSD data were also analyzed using multivariate principal component analysis, analysis of variance, and standard least squares effects modeling. The method suitability and validation parameters of both methods were compared. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first report that validates an ELSD method using a molten analyte. SOA exhibited a low molar absorptivity of 439 absorption units/cm/M in water at 210 nm requiring low-wavelength UV-DAD detection. The low-wavelength UV-DAD method provided substantially better intraday and interday precision, intraday and interday goodness-of-fit, detection limit, and quantitation limit than ELSD. ELSD exhibited a 60-fold greater area-under-the-curve response, better resolution, and 58% more theoretical plates. On balance, the UV-DAD method was chosen for SOA chemical kinetic studies. This study illustrates that ELSD may not always be the best alternative to gradient HPLC low-wavelength UV detection.
本文报道了一种蔗糖八乙酸酯(SOA)梯度高效液相色谱蒸发光散射检测(ELSD)和低波长紫外二极管阵列检测(UV-DAD)的特定稳定性指示方法的开发与验证比较。采用中心复合响应面设计和多标准优化,以最大化熔融SOA的曲线下面积响应和信噪比。还使用多元主成分分析、方差分析和标准最小二乘效应建模对ELSD数据进行了分析。比较了两种方法的方法适用性和验证参数。据作者所知,这是首次使用熔融分析物验证ELSD方法的报告。SOA在210nm水中的摩尔吸光系数较低,为439吸收单位/cm/M,需要低波长UV-DAD检测。低波长UV-DAD方法在日内和日间精密度、日内和日间拟合优度、检测限和定量限方面比ELSD有显著更好的表现。ELSD的曲线下面积响应大60倍,分辨率更好,理论塔板数多58%。总体而言,选择UV-DAD方法用于SOA化学动力学研究。本研究表明,ELSD不一定总是梯度高效液相色谱低波长紫外检测的最佳替代方法。