Grant Tanner W, Lovro Luke R, Licini David J, Warth Lucian C, Ziemba-Davis Mary, Meneghini Robert M
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
IU Health Saxony Hospital, Orthopedics, Indiana University Health Physicians Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Fishers, Indiana.
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Mar;32(3):891-897. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.09.023. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
Femoral component stability and resistance to subsidence is critical for osseointegration and clinical success in cementless total hip arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to radiographically evaluate the anatomic fit and subsidence of 2 different proximally tapered, porous-coated modern cementless femoral component designs.
A retrospective cohort study of 126 consecutive cementless total hip arthroplasties was performed. Traditional fit-and-fill stems were implanted in the first 61 hips with the remaining 65 receiving morphometric tapered wedge stems. Preoperative bone morphology was radiographically assessed by the canal flare index. Canal fill in the coronal plane, subsidence, and the sagittal alignment of stems was measured digitally on immediate and 1-month postoperative radiographs.
Demographics and canal flare indices were similar between groups. The percentage of femoral canal fill was greater in the tapered wedge compared to the fit-and-fill stem (P = .001). There was significantly less subsidence in the tapered wedge design (0.3 mm) compared to the fit-and-fill design (1.1 mm) (P = .001). Subsidence significantly increased as body mass index (BMI) increased in the fit-and-fill stems, a finding not observed in the tapered wedge design (P = .013).
An anatomically designed morphometric tapered wedge femoral stem demonstrated greater axial stability and decreased subsidence with increasing BMI than a traditional fit-and-fill stem. The resistance to subsidence, irrespective of BMI, is likely due to the inherent axial stability of a tapered wedge design and may be the optimal stem design for obese patients.
在非骨水泥型全髋关节置换术中,股骨假体的稳定性及抗下沉能力对于骨整合及临床成功至关重要。本研究的目的是通过影像学评估两种不同的近端渐缩、多孔涂层的现代非骨水泥型股骨假体设计的解剖适配性及下沉情况。
对连续126例非骨水泥型全髋关节置换术进行回顾性队列研究。前61髋植入传统的适配填充型假体柄,其余65髋植入形态计量学渐缩楔形假体柄。术前通过髓腔扩口指数对骨形态进行影像学评估。在术后即刻及术后1个月的X线片上数字化测量冠状面的髓腔填充情况、下沉情况及假体柄的矢状位对线情况。
两组间人口统计学特征及髓腔扩口指数相似。与适配填充型假体柄相比,渐缩楔形假体柄的股骨髓腔填充百分比更高(P = .001)。与适配填充型设计(1.1 mm)相比,渐缩楔形设计的下沉明显更少(0.3 mm)(P = .001)。在适配填充型假体柄中,下沉随体重指数(BMI)增加而显著增加,而在渐缩楔形设计中未观察到这一现象(P = .013)。
与传统的适配填充型假体柄相比,解剖学设计的形态计量学渐缩楔形股骨干假体在BMI增加时表现出更大的轴向稳定性及下沉减少。无论BMI如何,其抗下沉能力可能归因于渐缩楔形设计固有的轴向稳定性,可能是肥胖患者的最佳假体柄设计。