Culling John F
School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Tower Building, Park Place, Cardiff, CF10 3AT, United Kingdom.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2016 Oct;140(4):2418. doi: 10.1121/1.4964401.
Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) for a target voice on the same virtual table were measured in various restaurant simulations under conditions of masking by between one and eight interferers at other tables. Results for different levels of reverberation and different simulation techniques were qualitatively similar. SRTs increased steeply with the number of interferers, reflecting progressive failure to perceptually unmask the target speech as the acoustic scene became more complex. For a single interferer, continuous noise was the most effective masker, and a single interfering voice of either gender was least effective. With two interferers, evidence of informational masking emerged as a difference in SRT between forward and reversed speech, but SRTs for all interferer types progressively converged at four and eight interferers. In simulation based on a real room, this occurred at a signal-to-noise ratio of around -5 dB.
在各种餐厅模拟环境中,测量了同一虚拟桌面上目标语音的言语接受阈值(SRT),这些环境中有一到八个干扰源在其他桌子上产生掩蔽效应。不同混响水平和不同模拟技术的结果在定性上相似。SRT随着干扰源数量的增加而急剧上升,这反映出随着声学场景变得更加复杂,在感知上对目标语音进行解掩蔽的能力逐渐下降。对于单个干扰源,连续噪声是最有效的掩蔽器,而任何性别的单个干扰语音效果最差。有两个干扰源时,信息掩蔽的证据表现为正向和反向语音的SRT差异,但在有四个和八个干扰源时,所有干扰源类型的SRT逐渐趋同。在基于真实房间的模拟中,这种情况发生在信噪比约为-5 dB时。