• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从国家卫生系统视角看,心血管疾病、慢性阻塞性肺疾病或2型糖尿病患者戒烟治疗中伐尼克兰报销的预算影响分析

Budgetary Impact Analysis of Reimbursement Varenicline for the Smoking-Cessation Treatment in Patients with Cardiovascular Diseases, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease or Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus: A National Health System Perspective.

作者信息

Cedillo Sergio, Sicras-Mainar Antoni, Jiménez-Ruiz Carlos A, Fernández de Bobadilla Jaime, Rejas-Gutiérrez Javier

机构信息

Trial Form Support Develop, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Eur Addict Res. 2017;23(1):7-18. doi: 10.1159/000449098. Epub 2016 Oct 29.

DOI:10.1159/000449098
PMID:27794567
Abstract

AIMS

The study aimed to assess the budgetary impact (BI) of reimbursing varenicline in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), type-2 diabetes mellitus (t2-DM) or cardiovascular diseases (CVD).

METHODS

The BI was estimated comparing the current non-reimbursed scenario versus a projected reimbursed scenario using the Spanish National Health System (SNHS) perspective. A hybrid model was developed using epidemiological data and Markov chains to estimate smoking cessation rates with varenicline during a 5-year horizon. Costs of cessation were considered in the reimbursement scenario only. Efficacy, expressed as a 1-year continuous abstinence rate, was derived from clinical trials. Cost savings due to smoking cessation were extracted from local cost-of-illness studies. Results are shown as incremental cost savings. Univariate sensitivity analysis was also applied.

RESULTS

A total of 68,684 patients stopped smoking in the reimbursed scenario compared with 15,208 without reimbursement. In the reimbursed scenario, total savings accounted for €36.3 million, showing 14.6 million accumulated additional savings compared with the scenario without reimbursement. Sensitivity analyses showed results to be robust with monetary savings starting in the third year of modeling.

CONCLUSION

Reimbursement of varenicline in smoking cessation is a cost-effective health policy in the SNHS in COPD, t2-DM or CVD, and could produce cost savings starting in the third year of implementation.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)、2型糖尿病(t2-DM)或心血管疾病(CVD)患者中报销伐尼克兰的预算影响(BI)。

方法

从西班牙国家卫生系统(SNHS)的角度,通过比较当前未报销情况与预计报销情况来估计预算影响。利用流行病学数据和马尔可夫链开发了一个混合模型,以估计在5年期间使用伐尼克兰的戒烟率。仅在报销情况下考虑戒烟成本。疗效以1年持续戒烟率表示,来自临床试验。戒烟带来的成本节约从当地疾病成本研究中提取。结果以增量成本节约表示。还进行了单变量敏感性分析。

结果

在报销情况下,共有68684名患者戒烟,而未报销情况下为15208名。在报销情况下,总节约额为3630万欧元,与未报销情况相比,累计额外节约1460万欧元。敏感性分析表明,从建模的第三年开始,货币节约的结果是稳健的。

结论

在COPD、t2-DM或CVD患者中报销伐尼克兰用于戒烟在SNHS中是一项具有成本效益的卫生政策,并且从实施的第三年开始可能产生成本节约。

相似文献

1
Budgetary Impact Analysis of Reimbursement Varenicline for the Smoking-Cessation Treatment in Patients with Cardiovascular Diseases, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease or Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus: A National Health System Perspective.从国家卫生系统视角看,心血管疾病、慢性阻塞性肺疾病或2型糖尿病患者戒烟治疗中伐尼克兰报销的预算影响分析
Eur Addict Res. 2017;23(1):7-18. doi: 10.1159/000449098. Epub 2016 Oct 29.
2
Budgetary impact analysis on funding smoking-cessation drugs in patients with COPD in Spain.西班牙慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者戒烟药物资金的预算影响分析。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015 Sep 24;10:2027-36. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S87597. eCollection 2015.
3
Modelling a budgetary impact analysis for funding drug-based smoking cessation therapies for patients with major depressive disorder in Spain.为西班牙患有重度抑郁症的患者提供药物戒烟治疗的预算影响分析建模。
Eur Psychiatry. 2017 Sep;45:41-49. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.05.027. Epub 2017 Jun 3.
4
Cost-effectiveness of varenicline versus bupropion, nicotine-replacement therapy, and unaided cessation in Greece.希腊伐伦克林与安非他酮、尼古丁替代疗法和非药物戒烟的成本效益比较。
Clin Ther. 2012 Aug;34(8):1803-14. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.07.002. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
5
A cost-effectiveness model of smoking cessation based on a randomised controlled trial of varenicline versus placebo in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.基于一项随机对照试验,比较了在慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中使用伐尼克兰与安慰剂戒烟的成本效益模型。
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2011 Dec;12(17):2613-26. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2011.628935. Epub 2011 Oct 21.
6
Cost-effectiveness analysis of varenicline versus existing smoking cessation strategies in Central America and the Caribbean using the BENESCO model.使用BENESCO模型对中美洲和加勒比地区伐尼克兰与现有戒烟策略进行成本效益分析。
Hosp Pract (1995). 2012 Feb;40(1):24-34. doi: 10.3810/hp.2012.02.945.
7
Cost Effectiveness of Free Access to Smoking Cessation Treatment in France Considering the Economic Burden of Smoking-Related Diseases.考虑到吸烟相关疾病的经济负担,法国免费提供戒烟治疗的成本效益
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 24;11(2):e0148750. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148750. eCollection 2016.
8
The long-term cost-effectiveness of varenicline (12-week standard course and 12 + 12-week extended course) vs. other smoking cessation strategies in Canada.伐尼克兰(12周标准疗程和12 + 12周延长疗程)与加拿大其他戒烟策略相比的长期成本效益。
Int J Clin Pract. 2014 May;68(5):639-46. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12363. Epub 2014 Jan 29.
9
Cost analysis of varenicline versus bupropion, nicotine replacement therapy, and unaided cessation in Nicaragua.伐尼克兰与安非他酮、尼古丁替代疗法及尼加拉瓜无辅助戒烟的成本分析。
Hosp Pract (1995). 2012 Feb;40(1):35-43. doi: 10.3810/hp.2012.02.946.
10
Cost effectiveness of varenicline versus bupropion and unaided cessation for smoking cessation in a cohort of Finnish adult smokers.在芬兰成年烟民队列中,比较伐伦克林、安非他酮与未辅助戒烟对戒烟的成本效果。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Mar;26(3):549-60. doi: 10.1185/03007990903542666.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Funding Medications for Nicotine Dependence on Tobacco Control: A Narrative Review.资助尼古丁依赖药物对烟草控制的影响:一项叙述性综述。
Open Respir Arch. 2025 Feb 5;7(1):100410. doi: 10.1016/j.opresp.2025.100410. eCollection 2025 Jan-Mar.
2
Identifying best modelling practices for tobacco control policy simulations: a systematic review and a novel quality assessment framework.识别烟草控制政策模拟的最佳建模实践:系统评价和新的质量评估框架。
Tob Control. 2023 Sep;32(5):589-598. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056825. Epub 2022 Jan 11.