• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

水分亏缺状况与土壤改良对喜马拉雅山脉东北部亚热带地区玉米(Zea mays l.)蒸散损失及水分利用效率的影响

Response of water deficit regime and soil amelioration on evapotranspiration loss and water use efficiency of maize (Zea mays l.) in subtropical northeastern Himalayas.

作者信息

Marwein M A, Choudhury B U, Chakraborty D, Kumar M, Das A, Rajkhowa D J

机构信息

ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Umroi Road, Umiam, Meghalaya, 793103, India.

出版信息

Int J Biometeorol. 2017 May;61(5):845-855. doi: 10.1007/s00484-016-1262-4. Epub 2016 Oct 29.

DOI:10.1007/s00484-016-1262-4
PMID:27796568
Abstract

Rainfed maize production in the hilly ecosystem of Northeastern Himalayas often suffers from moisture and soil acidity induced abiotic stresses. The present study measured evapotranspiration loss (ET) of maize crop under controlled condition (pot experiment) of water deficit (W-25 % and W-50 % of field capacity soil moistures) and well watered (W = 100 % of field capacity (FC)) regimes in strong acid soils (pH = 4.3) of the Northeastern Himalayan Region of India. The response of soil ameliorants (lime) and phosphorus (P) nutrition under differential water regimes on ET losses and water use efficiency was also studied. The measured seasonal ET loss varied from 124.3 to 270.9 mm across treatment combinations. Imposition of water deficit stress resulted in significant (p < 0.05) reduction (by 33-50 %) of seasonal ET losses but was at the cost of delay in tasseling to silking, 47-65 % reduction in dry matter accumulation (DMA), 12-22 days shortening of grain formation period, and complete kernel abortion. Liming @ 4 t ha significantly (p < 0.05) increased ET losses and DMA across water regimes but the magnitude of increase was higher in severely water deficit (W) regime. Unlike lime, P nutrition improved DMA only in well-watered regimes (W) while seasonal ET loss was unaffected. Vegetative stage (tillering to tasseling) contributed the maximum ET losses while weekly crop ET loss was estimated highest during 11th-14th week after sowing (coincided with blistering stage) and then declined. Water use efficiency estimated from dry matter produced per unit ET losses and irrigation water used varied from 4.33 to 9.43 g dry matter kg water and 4.21 to 8.56 g dry matter kg, respectively. Among the input factors (water, P, and lime), water regime most strongly influenced the ET loss, growth duration, grain formation, and water use efficiency of maize.

摘要

印度喜马拉雅地区东北部山区生态系统中的雨养玉米生产常常受到水分和土壤酸度引发的非生物胁迫影响。本研究在印度喜马拉雅地区东北部强酸性土壤(pH = 4.3)中,通过控制水分亏缺(田间持水量的25%和50%)和充分灌溉(田间持水量的100%)条件(盆栽试验),测定了玉米作物的蒸散损失(ET)。同时还研究了不同水分条件下土壤改良剂(石灰)和磷(P)营养对ET损失和水分利用效率的影响。各处理组合的季节性ET损失测量值在124.3至270.9毫米之间。水分亏缺胁迫导致季节性ET损失显著(p < 0.05)降低(降低33%至50%),但代价是抽雄至吐丝延迟、干物质积累(DMA)减少47%至65%、籽粒形成期缩短12至22天以及籽粒完全败育。每公顷施用4吨石灰显著(p < 0.05)增加了不同水分条件下的ET损失和DMA,但在严重水分亏缺(W)条件下增加幅度更大。与石灰不同,磷营养仅在充分灌溉(W)条件下提高了DMA,而季节性ET损失不受影响。营养生长阶段(分蘖至抽雄)的ET损失最大,而每周作物ET损失在播种后第11至14周(与泡状期一致)估计最高,随后下降。根据单位ET损失产生的干物质和灌溉用水估算的水分利用效率分别在4.33至9.43克干物质/千克水和4.21至8.56克干物质/千克之间。在输入因素(水、磷和石灰)中,水分条件对玉米的ET损失、生长持续时间、籽粒形成和水分利用效率影响最大。

相似文献

1
Response of water deficit regime and soil amelioration on evapotranspiration loss and water use efficiency of maize (Zea mays l.) in subtropical northeastern Himalayas.水分亏缺状况与土壤改良对喜马拉雅山脉东北部亚热带地区玉米(Zea mays l.)蒸散损失及水分利用效率的影响
Int J Biometeorol. 2017 May;61(5):845-855. doi: 10.1007/s00484-016-1262-4. Epub 2016 Oct 29.
2
Liming effects of poultry litter derived biochar on soil acidity amelioration and maize growth.禽畜粪便衍生生物炭对土壤酸化的改良作用及对玉米生长的影响。
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2020 Oct 1;202:110865. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110865. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
3
Impact of controlled release urea on maize yield and nitrogen use efficiency under different water conditions.不同水分条件下控释尿素对玉米产量和氮素利用效率的影响
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 24;12(7):e0181774. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181774. eCollection 2017.
4
Maize plant nitrogen uptake dynamics at limited irrigation water and nitrogen.有限灌溉水和氮条件下玉米植株的氮素吸收动态
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017 Jan;24(3):2549-2557. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-8031-0. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
5
Impacts of different soil fertility improvement practices with film mulched ridge-furrow til-lage on soil nutrient content, maize yield, and water use efficiency in Northwest China.中国西北不同土壤肥力改良措施结合地膜覆盖垄沟耕作对土壤养分含量、玉米产量及水分利用效率的影响
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2019 Mar;30(3):893-905. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201903.029.
6
Variation in yield gap induced by nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer in North China Plain.氮、磷、钾肥对华北平原产量差距的影响。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 12;8(12):e82147. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082147. eCollection 2013.
7
Forages and Pastures Symposium: development of and field experience with drought-tolerant maize.饲料与牧场研讨会:耐旱玉米的开发及田间试验经验
J Anim Sci. 2014 Jul;92(7):2823-31. doi: 10.2527/jas.2013-7373. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
8
Deficit irrigation and planting patterns strategies to improve maize yield and water productivity at different plant densities in semi-arid regions.亏缺灌溉和种植模式策略,以提高半干旱地区不同种植密度下的玉米产量和水分生产力。
Sci Rep. 2017 Oct 24;7(1):13881. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14133-1.
9
Biochar improves maize growth by alleviation of nutrient stress in a moderately acidic low-input Nepalese soil.生物炭通过缓解尼泊尔中酸性低投入土壤中的养分胁迫来促进玉米生长。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Jun 1;625:1380-1389. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.022. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
10
Impacts of industrial waste resources on maize (Zea mays L.) growth, yield, nutrients uptake and soil properties.工业废弃物资源对玉米(Zea mays L.)生长、产量、养分吸收和土壤特性的影响。
Waste Manag. 2014 Oct;34(10):1877-83. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.01.007. Epub 2014 Feb 5.

引用本文的文献

1
The Interrelationship Between Water Use Efficiency and Radiation Use Efficiency Under Progressive Soil Drying in Maize.玉米土壤逐渐干燥条件下水分利用效率与辐射利用效率的相互关系
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Dec 10;12:794409. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.794409. eCollection 2021.