Suppr超能文献

比较沁水河流域、贡湖湾、太湖流域不同生态修复方法对硝酸盐和铵盐的去除效果。

Comparison of different ecological remediation methods for removing nitrate and ammonium in Qinshui River, Gonghu Bay, Taihu Lake.

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Pollutant Control and Resources Reuse, School of the Environment, Nanjing University, 163 Xianlin Avenue, Nanjing, 210023, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017 Jan;24(2):1706-1718. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-7963-8. Epub 2016 Oct 29.

Abstract

Ecological remediation is one of the most practical methods for removing nutrients from river ecosystems. In this study, transformation and fate of nitrate and ammonium among four different ecological restoration treatments were investigated by stable N isotope pairing technique combined with quantitative polymerase chain reaction and high-throughput sequencing technology. The results of N mass-balance model showed that there were three ways to the fate of nitrogen: precipitated in the sediment, absorbed by Elodea nuttallii (E. nuttallii), and consumed by microbial processes (denitrification and anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox)). The results shown that the storage of NH in sediments was about 1.5 times as much as that of NO. And much more NH was assimilated by E. nuttallii, about 2 times as much as NO. Contrarily, the rate of microbial consuming NO was higher than converting NH. As for the group with NO added, 29.61, 45.26, 30.66, and 51.95 % were accounted for N-labeled gas emission. The proportions of NH loss as N-labeled gas were 16.06, 28.86, 16.93, and 33.09 % in four different treatments, respectively. Denitrification and anammox were the bacterial primary processes in N and NO production. The abundances of denitrifying and anammox functional genes were relatively higher in the treatment with E. nuttallii-immobilized nitrogen cycling bacteria (E-INCB) assemblage technology applied. Besides, microbial diversity increased in the treatment with E. nuttallii and INCB added. The NO removal rates were 35.27, 49.42, 50.02, and 65.46 % in four different treatments. And the removal rates of NH were 24, 34.38, 48.84, and 57.74 % in treatments A, B, C, and D, respectively. The results indicated that E-INCB assemblage technology could significantly promote the nitrogen cycling and improve nitrogen removal efficiency.

摘要

生态修复是去除河流生态系统中营养物质的最实用方法之一。在本研究中,采用稳定氮同位素配对技术结合定量聚合酶链反应和高通量测序技术,研究了四种不同生态修复处理中硝酸盐和铵盐的转化和归宿。氮质量平衡模型的结果表明,氮的归宿有三种方式:沉淀在沉积物中、被水蕴草(E. nuttallii)吸收以及被微生物过程(反硝化和厌氧氨氧化(anammox))消耗。结果表明,沉积物中 NH 的储存量约为 NO 的 1.5 倍。并且更多的 NH 被水蕴草吸收,约为 NO 的 2 倍。相反,微生物消耗 NO 的速率高于转化 NH 的速率。对于添加 NO 的组,29.61%、45.26%、30.66%和 51.95%被标记为气体排放。在四种不同处理中,NH 损失作为标记气体的比例分别为 16.06%、28.86%、16.93%和 33.09%。反硝化和厌氧氨氧化是氮和 NO 产生的细菌主要过程。在应用水蕴草固定氮循环细菌(E-INCB)组合技术的处理中,反硝化和厌氧氨氧化功能基因的丰度相对较高。此外,添加水蕴草和 INCB 的处理中微生物多样性增加。四种不同处理中 NO 的去除率分别为 35.27%、49.42%、50.02%和 65.46%。处理 A、B、C 和 D 中 NH 的去除率分别为 24%、34.38%、48.84%和 57.74%。结果表明,E-INCB 组合技术可显著促进氮循环并提高氮去除效率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验