Suppr超能文献

一项评估聚乙二醇化脂质体阿霉素与卡培他滨作为转移性乳腺癌一线治疗方案的随机III期研究:鹈鹕研究结果

A randomized phase III study evaluating pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus capecitabine as first-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer: results of the PELICAN study.

作者信息

Harbeck Nadia, Saupe Steffen, Jäger Elke, Schmidt Marcus, Kreienberg Rolf, Müller Lothar, Otremba Burkhard Joerg, Waldenmaier Dirk, Dorn Julia, Warm Mathias, Scholz Michael, Untch Michael, de Wit Maike, Barinoff Jana, Lück Hans-Joachim, Harter Philipp, Augustin Doris, Harnett Paul, Beckmann Matthias W, Al-Batran Salah-Eddin

机构信息

Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and CCC of LMU, University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Jan;161(1):63-72. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-4033-3. Epub 2016 Oct 31.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The PELICAN trial evaluates for the first time efficacy and safety of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) versus capecitabine as first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

METHODS

This randomized, phase III, open-label, multicenter trial enrolled first-line MBC patients who were ineligible for endocrine or trastuzumab therapy. Cumulative adjuvant anthracyclines of 360 mg/m doxorubicin or equivalent were allowed. Left ventricular ejection fraction of >50 % was required. Patients received PLD 50 mg/m every 28 days or capecitabine 1250 mg/m twice daily for 14 days every 21 days. The primary endpoint was time-to-disease progression (TTP).

RESULTS

210 patients were randomized (n = 105, PLD and n = 105, capecitabine). Adjuvant anthracyclines were given to 37 % (PLD) and 36 % (capecitabine) of patients. No significant difference was observed in TTP [HR = 1.21 (95 % confidence interval, 0.838-1.750)]. Median TTP was 6.0 months for both PLD and capecitabine. Comparing patients with or without prior anthracyclines, no significant difference in TTP was observed in the PLD arm (log-rank P = 0.64). For PLD versus capecitabine, respectively, overall survival (median, 23.3 months vs. 26.8 months) and time-to-treatment failure (median, 4.6 months vs. 3.7 months) were not statistically significantly different. Compared to PLD, patients on capecitabine experienced more serious adverse events (P = 0.015) and more cardiac events among patients who had prior anthracycline exposure (18 vs. 8 %; P = 0.31).

CONCLUSION

Both PLD and capecitabine are effective first-line agents for MBC.

摘要

目的

PELICAN试验首次评估了聚乙二醇化脂质体阿霉素(PLD)与卡培他滨作为转移性乳腺癌(MBC)一线治疗的疗效和安全性。

方法

这项随机、III期、开放标签、多中心试验纳入了不适合接受内分泌或曲妥珠单抗治疗的一线MBC患者。允许累积使用360mg/m阿霉素或等效的辅助蒽环类药物。左心室射血分数需>50%。患者每28天接受一次50mg/m的PLD,或每21天每天两次、每次1250mg/m的卡培他滨,持续14天。主要终点是疾病进展时间(TTP)。

结果

210例患者被随机分组(n = 105,PLD组和n = 105,卡培他滨组)。37%(PLD组)和36%(卡培他滨组)的患者接受了辅助蒽环类药物治疗。TTP未观察到显著差异[风险比(HR)= 1.21(95%置信区间,0.838 - 1.750)]。PLD组和卡培他滨组的中位TTP均为6.0个月。比较有或没有接受过蒽环类药物治疗的患者,PLD组的TTP未观察到显著差异(对数秩检验P = 0.64)。对于PLD组和卡培他滨组,总生存期(中位值,23.3个月对26.8个月)和治疗失败时间(中位值,4.6个月对3.7个月)在统计学上均无显著差异。与PLD组相比,卡培他滨组的患者经历了更严重的不良事件(P = 0.015),并且在接受过蒽环类药物治疗的患者中发生心脏事件的更多(18%对8%;P = 0.31)。

结论

PLD和卡培他滨都是有效的MBC一线治疗药物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67b3/5222915/3a5c9a2e58e9/10549_2016_4033_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验