• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者及医疗服务提供者对“不要复苏”和“不要插管”的解读。

Patient and Health-Care Provider Interpretation of do not Resuscitate and do not Intubate.

作者信息

Pirinea Heather, Simunich Thomas, Wehner Daniel, Ashurst John

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Memorial Medical Center, Johnstown, PA, USA.

Department of Research, Memorial Medical Center, Johnstown, PA, USA.

出版信息

Indian J Palliat Care. 2016 Oct-Dec;22(4):432-436. doi: 10.4103/0973-1075.191784.

DOI:10.4103/0973-1075.191784
PMID:27803565
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5072235/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Advance directives and end of life care are difficult discussions for both patients and health-care providers (HCPs). A HCP requires an accurate understanding of advanced directives to educate patients and their family members to allow them to make an appropriate decision. Misinterpretations of the do not resuscitate (DNR), do not intubate (DNI), and the Physicians Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) form result in ineffective communication and confusion between patients, family members, and HCPs.

METHODOLOGY

An anonymous, multiple choice online and paper survey was distributed to patients, family members of patients (PFMs), and HCPs from December 12, 2012 to March 6, 2013. Data regarding demographics, the accuracy of determining the correct definition of DNR and DNI, the familiarity of the POLST form and if a primary care physician had discussed advanced directives with the participants were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 687 respondents participated in the survey. Patients and PFMs could not distinguish the definition of DNR (95% confidence interval [CI] [1.453-2.804]) or DNI (95% CI (1.216-2.334)) 52% of the time while HCPs 35% and 39% of the time ( < 0.0005). Regarding the POLST form, 86% of patients and PFMs and 50% of HCPs were not familiar with the POLST form. Sixty-nine percent of patients and family members reported that their primary care physician had not discussed advance directives with them. Twenty-four percent of patients and family members reported that they had previous health-care experience and this was associated with increased knowledge of the POLST form ( < 0.0005). An association was also seen between the type of HCP taking the survey and the ability to correctly identify the correct definition of DNR ( < 0.0005).

CONCLUSION

Discussion of end of life care is difficult for patients and their family members. Often times multiple discussions are required in order to effectively communicate the definition of DNR, DNI, and the POLST form. Education of patients, family members, and HCPs is required to bridge the knowledge gap of advance directives.

摘要

背景

对患者和医疗保健提供者(HCPs)而言,预立医疗指示和临终关怀都是难以进行的讨论。HCPs需要准确理解预立医疗指示,以便对患者及其家属进行教育,使其能够做出恰当的决定。对“不要复苏”(DNR)、“不要插管”(DNI)以及“医生维持生命治疗医嘱”(POLST)表格的误解,会导致患者、家属和HCPs之间沟通无效和产生困惑。

方法

从2012年12月12日至2013年3月6日,向患者、患者家属(PFMs)和HCPs发放了一份匿名的在线多项选择题纸质调查问卷。收集了有关人口统计学的数据、确定DNR和DNI正确定义的准确性、对POLST表格的熟悉程度,以及初级保健医生是否与参与者讨论过预立医疗指示的情况。

结果

共有687名受访者参与了调查。患者和PFMs有52%的时间无法区分DNR(95%置信区间[CI][1.453 - 2.804])或DNI(95% CI[1.216 - 2.334])的定义,而HCPs分别有这一情况的时间为35%和39%(<0.0005)。关于POLST表格,86%的患者和PFMs以及50%的HCPs不熟悉该表格。69%的患者和家属表示,他们的初级保健医生没有与他们讨论过预立医疗指示。24%的患者和家属表示他们有过医疗保健经历,这与对POLST表格的了解增加相关(<0.0005)。参与调查的HCPs类型与正确识别DNR正确定义的能力之间也存在关联(<0.0005)。

结论

对患者及其家属来说,临终关怀的讨论很困难。通常需要多次讨论才能有效地传达DNR、DNI和POLST表格的定义。需要对患者、家属和HCPs进行教育,以弥合预立医疗指示方面的知识差距。

相似文献

1
Patient and Health-Care Provider Interpretation of do not Resuscitate and do not Intubate.患者及医疗服务提供者对“不要复苏”和“不要插管”的解读。
Indian J Palliat Care. 2016 Oct-Dec;22(4):432-436. doi: 10.4103/0973-1075.191784.
2
Factors associated with combined do-not-resuscitate and do-not-intubate orders: A retrospective chart review at an urban tertiary care center.与联合不予复苏和不予插管医嘱相关的因素:城市三级保健中心的回顾性图表审查。
Resuscitation. 2018 Sep;130:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.06.020. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
3
TRIAD VI: how well do emergency physicians understand Physicians Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) forms?TRIAD VI:急诊医师对《维持生命治疗医师指令》(POLST)表单的理解程度如何?
J Patient Saf. 2015 Mar;11(1):1-8. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000165.
4
Advance directives in the emergency department.急诊科的预立医疗指示
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2020 Apr 7;1(3):270-275. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12021. eCollection 2020 Jun.
5
Reasons for Discordance Between Life-Sustaining Treatment Preferences and Medical Orders in Nursing Facilities Without POLST.无缓和医疗预嘱的护理机构中维持生命治疗偏好与医疗指令之间存在差异的原因。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2023 Aug;40(8):837-843. doi: 10.1177/10499091221127996. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
6
Characteristics and outcomes of patients with do-not-resuscitate and physician orders for life-sustaining treatment in a medical intensive care unit: a retrospective cohort study.在医疗重症监护病房中,具有“不复苏”和医师生命维持治疗医嘱的患者的特征和结局:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Feb 15;23(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01375-w.
7
DNR, DNI, and DNO?DNR、DNI 和 DNO?
J Palliat Med. 2020 Jun;23(6):829-831. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0486. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
8
Underutilization of Portable Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment at Discharge from Hospital: Observational Study at US Academic Trauma Center.医院出院时维持生命治疗便携式医嘱的利用不足:美国学术创伤中心的观察性研究
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jul;35(7):2065-2068. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05698-1. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
9
A prospective study of the efficacy of the physician order form for life-sustaining treatment.一份关于维持生命治疗医嘱表格有效性的前瞻性研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998 Sep;46(9):1097-102. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1998.tb06647.x.
10
Life-sustaining treatment decisions for nursing home residents: who discusses, who decides and what is decided?养老院居民维持生命治疗的决策:谁参与讨论、谁做出决定以及决定了什么?
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999 Jan;47(1):82-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb01905.x.

本文引用的文献

1
Physician orders for life-sustaining treatment and emergency medicine: ethical considerations, legal issues, and emerging trends.医生下达的维持生命治疗医嘱与急救医学:伦理考量、法律问题及新趋势。
Ann Emerg Med. 2014 Aug;64(2):140-4. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.03.014. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
2
TRIAD III: nationwide assessment of living wills and do not resuscitate orders.第三部分:全国范围内对生前遗嘱和不进行心肺复苏医嘱的评估。
J Emerg Med. 2012 May;42(5):511-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2011.07.015. Epub 2011 Nov 17.
3
The evolution of health care advance planning law and policy.医疗保健预先计划法律和政策的演变。
Milbank Q. 2010 Jun;88(2):211-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2010.00596.x.
4
Advance directive and POLST: complements and contrasts.
Oreg Nurse. 2009 Nov:9.
5
A prospective study of the efficacy of the physician order form for life-sustaining treatment.一份关于维持生命治疗医嘱表格有效性的前瞻性研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998 Sep;46(9):1097-102. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1998.tb06647.x.
6
The meaning of DNR status: oncology nurses' experiences with patients and families.“不要复苏”状态的意义:肿瘤护士与患者及家属的经历
Cancer Nurs. 1998 Jun;21(3):212-21. doi: 10.1097/00002820-199806000-00009.