Yuan Wenming, Cheng Genyang, Li Bin, Li Yansheng, Lu Shan, Liu Dong, Xiao Jing, Zhao Zhanzheng
a Renal Division, Department of Medicine , First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University , Zhengzhou , China.
Blood Press. 2017 Jun;26(3):139-149. doi: 10.1080/08037051.2016.1208730. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness and safety of endothelin-receptor antagonist (ERA) in the patients with hypertension. Searches of the PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases were conducted to include all the randomized control trials (RCTs). Eighteen trials including 4898 patients were used in the meta-analysis, of which nine were classified as low risk of bias and the other nine as unclear risk of bias. There was no statistically significant difference in all-cause mortality between ERA and placebo groups [6 trials, fixed effects model, RR 1.53 (0.89-2.62); random effects model, RR 1.45 (0.84-2.52)]. ERA significantly reduced 24-h ambulatory blood pressure and sitting blood pressure in patients with hypertension [5 trials, 24-h SBP: WMD -7.65 (-8.95 to -6.36), 24-h DBP: WMD -5.92 (-7.50 to -4.33); 18 trials, SBP: WMD -6.12 (-7.87 to -4.36), DBP: WMD -3.81 (-4.82 to -2.80)]. However, ERA had more adverse events [within 24 h: 3 trials, RR 1.16 (0.82-1.65); after 24 h, 13 trials, RR 1.21 (1.08-1.36)] and severe adverse events than placebo controls [SAE: 9 trials, RR 1.34 (1.13-1.60)]. In addition, there is a potential need for further RCTs that focus on the use of ERA in patients with hypertension.
本荟萃分析的目的是评估内皮素受体拮抗剂(ERA)在高血压患者中的有效性和安全性。检索了PubMed、EMBASE和CENTRAL数据库,纳入所有随机对照试验(RCT)。荟萃分析使用了18项试验,共4898例患者,其中9项被归类为低偏倚风险,另外9项为偏倚风险不明确。ERA组和安慰剂组的全因死亡率无统计学显著差异[6项试验,固定效应模型,RR 1.53(0.89 - 2.62);随机效应模型,RR 1.45(0.84 - 2.52)]。ERA显著降低了高血压患者的24小时动态血压和坐位血压[5项试验,24小时收缩压:加权均数差 -7.65(-8.95至-6.36),24小时舒张压:加权均数差 -5.92(-7.50至-4.33);18项试验,收缩压:加权均数差 -6.12(-7.87至-4.36),舒张压:加权均数差 -3.81(-4.82至-2.80)]。然而,ERA组比安慰剂对照组有更多的不良事件[24小时内:3项试验,RR 1.16(0.82 - 1.65);24小时后,13项试验,RR 1.21(1.08 - 1.36)]和严重不良事件[严重不良事件:9项试验,RR 1.34(1.13 - 1.60)]。此外,可能需要进一步开展针对ERA在高血压患者中应用的随机对照试验。